Top 10 Alternatives to AutoSys Compared in 2025

AutoSys users are increasingly seeking alternatives due to its reliance on command-line interfaces, rising costs, and uncertainty under Broadcom. Based on our research, we chose the top 10 alternatives to AutoSys. We explained our selection rationale in the vendor’s sections and comparison tables. Use the links below to navigate directly.

Autosys Alternatives		Best For
1.	RunMyJobs by Redwood	Orchestrating SAP jobs while keeping a clean SAP core
2.	ActiveBatch	Hybrid cloud / API orchestration
3.	Stonebranch	Wide range of community-driven pre-packaged integrations delivered as SaaS
4.	Fortra's JAMS	PowerShell integration and job scheduling management on the .NET framework
5.	BMC Control-M	Data pipeline orchestration and managed file transfers
Show More (5)
6.	Airflow Job Scheduler	Open-source job scheduling
7.	Tidal by Redwood	Low-cost proprietary job scheduling
8.	SMA Opcon	Integrating workflows across multiple platforms
9.	IBM Workload Automation	Job orchestration in the IBM ecosystem
10.	HCL Workload Automation	Predictive analytics and dynamic resource allocation

1.

RunMyJobs by Redwood

Orchestrating SAP jobs while keeping a clean SAP core

2.

ActiveBatch

Hybrid cloud / API orchestration

3.

Stonebranch

Wide range of community-driven pre-packaged integrations delivered as SaaS

4.

Fortra's JAMS

PowerShell integration and job scheduling management on the .NET framework

5.

BMC Control-M

Data pipeline orchestration and managed file transfers

Show More (5)

6.

Airflow Job Scheduler

Open-source job scheduling

7.

Tidal by Redwood

Low-cost proprietary job scheduling

8.

SMA Opcon

Integrating workflows across multiple platforms

9.

IBM Workload Automation

Job orchestration in the IBM ecosystem

10.

HCL Workload Automation

Predictive analytics and dynamic resource allocation

See these solutions’ features, pros, cons, and popularity in B2B review platforms:

Comparison of top alternatives

*Ratings are based on top review platforms.

Ranking: We sorted companies first by sponsorship level, the vendors with links are sponsors, and then by their number of reviews.

Deployment and Security

AutoSys and Broadcom Overview

AutoSys Workload Automation was developed by CA Technologies (acquired by Broadcom in 2018).¹ It has been in the market since the 2000s. After acquiring the company, Broadcom laid off 2,000 of CA Technologies’ 4,837 employees (41% of the workforce).² This post-merger integration activity may have impacted support and R&D efforts.

Broadcom has a couple of WLA solutions in their product portfolio, including AutoSys, Automic Automation, Dollar Universe. While we are not yet sure of Broadcom’s plans, a future merger between these products are a possibility. Additionally, IT professionals reveal widespread concerns about significant price hikes under Broadcom’s management and citing uncertainties around pricing and support quality. ³

You should also consider the following developments:

Critical vulnerability cases

In parallel with licensing concerns, Broadcom-owned VMware products have faced a series of high-impact security vulnerabilities. One such flaw, CVE-2025-22230, is an authentication bypass in VMware Tools for Windows that could allow attackers with limited privileges to perform elevated operations within virtual machines.⁴

Additionally, three zero-day vulnerabilities—CVE-2025-22224, CVE-2025-22225, and CVE-2025-22226—affecting VMware ESXi, Workstation, and Fusion have been exploited in the wild. These vulnerabilities allowed attackers to escape the guest VM environment and execute code directly on host systems.⁵

We also addressed the price increases and the change of support frameworks in our articles covering Broadcom’s services. Please refer to the provided links for an overview of each development.

Top AutoSys alternatives analyzed

1-RunMyJobs by Redwood

RunMyJobs offers many of the core workload automation (WLA) capabilities that organizations using AutoSys rely on – but with some distinct differences that can make it an appealing alternative.

In contrast to AutoSys, which often requires on-premise setup and integration work, RunMyJobs’ SaaS delivery model can offer a faster onboarding through features like an on-demand free trial.

Pros

• Customizable workflows
• Setting up resilient parallel and dependent processes
• RunMyJobs can seamlessly link to a number of outside/Legacy systems. There won’t be any delays after the job is booked, therefore disruption of the work.
• Has advanced features like dashboards, logging, and a load balancer.
• Supports all browsers.

Cons

• While monitoring and alert services are useful, they could be improved.⁶
• Reporting features could be more refined.⁷

Choose RunMyJobs for industry-leading SAP integrations delivered as SaaS

See their offerings below:

2-ActiveBatch

ActiveBatch has some differences in design and integration approach that make it a viable alternative to AutoSys. ActiveBatch makes it easier for teams without deep technical expertise to create and adjust automated processes using visual tools like Flow Control Job Steps (e.g., ForEachRow, If-Branch). See Figure 1.

ActiveBatch also includes the Super REST API adapter, which simplifies connecting to external APIs, such as making AWS API calls. While AutoSys can integrate with various systems, this built-in API tool gives ActiveBatch an alternative route for integrating cloud services and external applications including open-source job schedulers.

Figure 1: ActiveBatch UI

Pros

• ActiveBatch works on nearly any operating system, including Windows, Linux, UNIX, Mac OS, and IBM iSeries AS/400.
• It offers comprehensive scalability and extensibility
• It has a low-code approach which would be attractive to non-technical AutoSys users that want to manage their workflows without relying on a command-line interface.
• Seamless monitoring and managing activities and workflows.

Cons

• While integration with third-party tools and systems is available, the process can be developed. ⁸
• Getting used to the UI and some features and functions requires training.⁹
• Customization options could be improved.¹⁰

Choose ActiveBatch for enterprise job scheduling with low-code API orchestration and cross-platform support across multiple environments.

3-Stonebranch

Stonebranch’s workload automation (WLA) tool, Universal Automation Center (UAC) users have access to the Stonebranch Integration Hub, where they can find community-contributed integration templates. Additionally, they can utilize dashboards and detailed reports to gain real-time insights and monitor service level agreements.

Pros

• Stonebranch offers comprehensive automation support for various environments, including cloud, multi-cloud, and on-premise setups. 
• It provides the flexibility to enable or disable automation effortlessly, allowing you to establish automation sequences throughout your system. 
• Stonebranch excels at consolidating your automation efforts, even in complex network configurations.

Cons

• It can be hard to manage the task monitor.
• Universal Automation Center could improve the analytics.
• They are a smaller vendor compared to workload automation market leaders such as ActiveBatch, RunMyjobs, etc.

Choose Stonebranch for a wide range of community-driven, pre-packaged integrations delivered as SaaS.

4-Fortra’s JAMS

Overall, Fortra’s JAMS serves as an alternative to AutoSys for organizations seeking a Windows-focused automation tool with strong PowerShell integration. Figure 2 displays the JAMS User Interface for reference.

Figure 2: Fortra’s JAMS

Pros 

• Alerting and notification are comprehensive.
• It has built-in native codeless functions and the ability to launch code in any runtime environment when needed.
• JAMS Scheduler offers security measures, including access controls, encryption, and authentication mechanisms, to safeguard sensitive data and prevent unauthorized access. These measures ensure the protection and integrity of critical information, guaranteeing its safety.
• Event-driven automation of JAMS assists organizations in enhancing resource optimization and aligning job execution with business priorities, resulting in improved productivity. This approach enables the efficient utilization of resources. 

Cons

• Considering its complex configurations, new users might need substantial time to use JAMS Scheduler proficiently.
• For organizations with simpler scheduling requirements or fewer jobs, JAMS Scheduler might be overly feature-rich, making it less suitable compared to more streamlined alternatives.
• It’s Windows-focused software, meaning other operating systems will have difficulties using its client.

Choose Fortra’s JAMS for comprehensive PowerShell integration for job scheduling management on the .NET framework.

5-Control-M by BMC Software

Control-M offers several notable functionalities, such as a unified control panel, advanced analytics for future predictions, a user-friendly web interface, and integration with widely used applications like Hadoop, Informatica, and SAP.

Pros

• Businesses can have granularity into the jobs then as access is assigned to users based on their roles, allowing the ability to order the job or maybe even just monitor the progress.
• Using AFT, sending files to customers is automated and can be customized for success, failure, etc., allowing visibility into the process for all involved.
• Control-M provides a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes in the organization. 
• Change management for the development cycle.
• Orchestration for batch processes.

Cons

• The interface could be improved.
• Installation and upgrades are not seamless.
• Making mass changes requires time and effort.

You can check our comprehensive workload automation list to have access to over 20 vendors with a strong market presence.

Discover other relevant automation platforms through our data-driven and comprehensive benchmarks and vendor lists:

• IT automation software benchmark and +25 vendors list.
• Data center automation software and +10 vendors list.

External Links

• 1. Broadcom to Acquire CA Technologies for $18.9 Billion in Cash | Broadcom Inc..
• 2. Broadcom Preps For Massive CA Technologies Layoffs: Report | CRN.
• 3. VMware customers may stay, but Broadcom could face backlash “for years to come” - Ars Technica. Ars Technica
• 4. NVD - CVE-2025-22230.
• 5. Broadcom Patches 3 VMware Zero-Days Exploited in the Wild - SecurityWeek. SecurityWeek
• 6. Redwood RunMyJobs reviews 2025.
• 7. Redwood RunMyJobs reviews 2025.
• 8. Simplify Your Workflow Using Active Batch Workload Automation | TrustRadius. TrustRadius
• 9. Streamline Your Workload with ActiveBatch Workload Automation | TrustRadius. TrustRadius
• 10. If you are looking for Best automation for business and IT, here you are | TrustRadius. TrustRadius