AIMultiple ResearchAIMultiple Research

Top 6 Alternatives to Automic Automation in 2024

In the IT automation landscape, selecting an appropriate solution is critical to efficiently manage tasks, mitigate risks, and enhance overall operational efficiency. Automic Automation is one of ~30 workload automation software in the WLA market, providing automation capabilities across various platforms and applications. However, given the unique and often niche requirements of businesses in the current environment, it is essential to explore several alternatives. 

Our goal is to examine the leading alternatives to Automic Automation in 2023. We assess each competitor’s user reviews and indicators of their market presence in WLA to determine their strengths and benefits. This enables businesses to streamline their evaluation process and make informed decisions.

Comparison of Automic Automation and Top 5 Alternatives

VendorRating*
ActiveBatch4.6 based on 246 reviews
Redwood RunMyJobs4.7 based on 148 reviews
Stonebranch4.5 based on 85 reviews
Tidal Workload Automation (TWA)4.7 based on 89 reviews
OpCon Workload Automation4.6 based on 34 reviews
Automic Automation4.4 based on 19 reviews
IBM Workload Automation4.3 based on 14 reviews

*Ratings are based on Capterra and G2. Vendors are sorted according to their reviews, except vendors with links, which are sponsors of AiMultiple.

Automic Automation Review

Automic Automation, now known as Broadcom Automation, is an enterprise-grade job scheduling platform that helps organizations streamline and automate their business processes. Automic Automation offers features and capabilities to enhance business operations, productivity, efficiency, and reliability in cloud environments.

Automic Automation has a long history of changing names and ownership:

  • Initially, Software Beratung Beranek (SBB) developed a product named “UC4”. As that product grew; the company named itself after this best-known product to facilitate recognition by audiences and customers in Europe in 2004.
  • In 2013, the company changed its name to Automic Automation.
  • In 2016, CA Technologies bought Automic Automation.
  • In 2018, CA Technologies was bought by Broadcom. Automic Automation is now officially owned by Broadcom. 

User Ratings:

Capterra: N/A

Gartner: 4.6/5 based on 3 Reviews1

G2: 4.4/5 based on 14 Reviews2

PeerSpot: 4.1/5 based on 13 Reviews3

TrustRadius: 6.8/10 based on 13 Reviews and Ratings4

Pros:

  • Operates both on Windows and UNIX systems.
  • Offers a complete scripting language with ready-made blocks of code.
  • Offers plug-ins and ready-made workflows, which allows the multi-client concept to prevail. (See Figure 1)
  • The software is integrated to manage and automate applications on the market, such as: Apache, Tomcat, Remedy, VMWare, SAP, MySql, Jenkins, Office365, NetScaler, Siebel, SSH, and Oracle.

Cons:

  • The file transfer area is not up to par with other solutions in the market and requires improvement (See Figure 1).
  • The debugger could be improved via more analytical and descriptive features.
  • Troubleshooting could be more guided.
  • Dashboard building features could be improved by introducing more options.
  • The web interface suffers from network downtime when it’s too crowded.

Figure 1: A Wipro Limited Employee’s Review of Automic Automation

Source: PeerSpot 5

Top 6 Automic Automation alternatives

1-ActiveBatch

ActiveBatch is an enterprise job scheduling software designed for workload automation and job scheduling, allowing IT groups to automate procedures and job sequences across multiple platforms. It is at the top of our list of Automic competitors since it is the most reviewed solution in this group. Number of reviews is correlated with a solution’s popularity.

It has collaborative software development tools that can automate application deployment workflows throughout the IT landscape, encompassing multi-cloud and on-premise environments. ActiveBatch features a low-code interface with drag-and-drop capabilities, which doesn’t necessitate advanced technical expertise to achieve mission-critical business processes. (Refer to Figure 2)

ActiveBatch provides a job scheduling solution designed with extensive compatibility with enterprise applications. ActiveBatch can execute command-line operations and therefore existing automations built with open-source job schedulers can be integrated or streamlined into the ActiveBatch system.

Figure 1: ActiveBatch UI

User Ratings

Capterra:4.8/5.0 based on 52 reviews6

Gartner:4.3/5.0 based on 61 Reviews7

G2: 4.6/5 based on 171 Reviews8

PeerSpot: 4.6/5 based on 16 reviews9

TrustRadius: 9.1/10 based on 29 votes10

Pros

  • ActiveBatch works on nearly every operating system, including Windows, Linux, UNIX, Mac OS, and IBM iSeries AS/400.
  • It offers comprehensive scalability and extensibility
  • It has a low-code approach 
  • Seamless monitoring and managing activities and workflows.
  • The dashboard is easy to access and has a comprehensive file transfer system.
  • ActiveBatch is a centralized workload automation.

Cons

  • While integration with third-party tools and systems is available, the process can be developed. 11
  • Getting used to the UI and some features and functions requires training.12
  • Customization options could be improved.13

2-Redwood RunMyJobs

Redwood RunMyJobs is a comprehensive workload automation solution tailored for crucial business process automation. As a SaaS platform, RunMyJobs is constructed to automate workloads, allowing users to unite diverse systems and data, irrespective of their IT environment’s size or complexity. RunMyJobs facilitates integration between on-premise and private or cloud-based SaaS solutions. It is one of the workload automation solutions that can be integrated with ERP systems, REST web service protocols, and securely manage file transfers. 

Check out their offering:

User Ratings:

Capterra: 4.8/5.0 based on 33 reviews.14

Gartner: N/A 

G2: 4.7/5 based on 117 reviews.15

PeerSpot: 4.8/5 based on 19 reviews.16

TrustRadius: 9.5/10 based on 28 votes.17

Pros

  • Customizable workflows
  • Setting up resilient parallel and dependent processes
  • RunMyJobs can seamlessly link to several outside/Legacy systems. There won’t be any delays after the job is booked, therefore disruption of the work.
  • Has advanced features like dashboards, logging, and a load balancer.
  • Supports all browsers.

Cons

  • While monitoring and alert services are useful, they could be improved.18
  • Reporting features could be improved.19

3-Stonebrach

Stonebranch is a workload automation solution that helps organizations automate, manage, and orchestrate IT processes from a centralized command center-style platform. Stonebranch offers holistic control over workflows across multiple platforms and business applications regardless of where the data resides. Users can easily create workflows with a drag-and-drop user interface and manage the workload of their enterprise.

With Stonebranch, users can integrate to any platform or application with pre-packaged integrations, build their own, or download integration blueprints from the community-driven open-source Stonebranch Integration Hub. They can access visual dashboards and drill-down reports designed to enable real-time guidance and SLA monitoring.

User Ratings

Capterra: N/A

Gartner: 4.7/5.0 based on 7 Reviews 20

G2: 4.5/5 based on 74 reviews21

PeerSpot:3.8/5 based on 26 reviews22

TrustRadius: None

4-IBM Workload Automation

IBM Workload Automation is a workload automation platform developed by IBM that assists businesses in effectively managing and automating their most complex workloads and environments across different systems, platforms, and applications.

This solution provides a comprehensive and scalable approach to scheduling and performing various jobs, tasks, cloud resources, and processes in distributed environments. It incorporates numerous capabilities and functionalities designed to improve workload execution, optimize resource utilization, increase efficiency, and ensure the timely completion of crucial business activities.

User Ratings:

Capterra: 4.0/5 based on 8 Reviews23

Gartner: N/A

G2: 4.3/5 based on 13 Reviews24

PeerSpot: 4.0/5 based on 4 Reviews25

TrustRadius: 7.3/5.0 based on 7 Reviews26

Pros:

  • Enables straightforward operations.
  • Features a user-friendly interface that is both simple and efficient.
  • IBM Workload Scheduler enables event-based automation, triggering jobs based on real-time events or specific conditions.

Cons:

  • While working with the REST API and obtaining responses, there may still be a need for manual tasks and optimization.

5-OpCon Workload Automation

OpCon Workload Automation is a solution designed to manage and automate IT and business processes within organizations. It is a software platform developed by SMA Technologies that provides control and monitoring capabilities for workload scheduling configuration management, job execution, infrastructure management, and process automation.

OpCon offers features and functionalities to streamline operations and improve efficiency. It also supports event-based workflow automation, triggering automated processing workflows based on real-time events or specific conditions.

User Ratings:

Capterra: 4.8/5 based on 4 Reviews27

Gartner: 4.9/5 based on 69 Ratings28

G2: 4.6/5 based on 30 Reviews29

PeerSpot: 4.5/5 based on 16 Reviews30

TrustRadius: N/A

Pros:

  • It can be leveraged to call batch scripts, access SFTP, monitor email accounts, and perform specific actions based on filtering incoming emails to trigger events.

Cons:

  • The learning curve could be steep for administrators.

6-Tidal Workload Automation (TWA)

Tidal Workload Automation is a job and workflow orchestration and automation tool crafted to assist companies in handling intricate IT tasks effectively. It is compatible with a variety of platforms, databases, and applications. The platform provides features like intelligent automation triggered by events, in-depth reporting, and a unified control panel for managing jobs.

User Ratings:

Capterra: 4.7/5 based on 32 Reviews31

Gartner:5/5 based on 1 Review32

G2: 4.7/5 based on 57 Reviews33

PeerSpot:4.7/5.0 based on 18 Reviews34

TrustRadius: 8.3/10 based on 26 Reviews35

Pros:

  • Flexibility and customization options also make it popular for businesses looking to tailor automation to their specific needs.

Cons:

  • The UI can be improved
  • Job failure alerts are not comprehensive
  • Reporting in terms of production statistics can be improved

More alternatives

Automic Automation is a workload automation tool with functionality that can be categorized under the categories below. You can learn about more alternatives on the pages that explain a few top vendors in detail:

Or check out complete vendor lists in these categories:

AIMultiple analyzed WLA vendors using relevant, public, and verifiable criteria covering vendor market presence and functionality. You can download the whitepaper to identify the market leaders to help you make your business decision.

Transparency statement

Numerous emerging tech firms, such as Redwood, Stonebranch and Activebatch are sponsors of AIMultiple.

Find the Right Vendors
Access Cem's 2 decades of B2B tech experience as a tech consultant, enterprise leader, startup entrepreneur & industry analyst. Leverage insights informing top Fortune 500 every month.
Cem Dilmegani
Principal Analyst
Follow on
Altay Ataman
Altay is an industry analyst at AIMultiple. He has background in international political economy, multilateral organizations, development cooperation, global politics, and data analysis. He has experience working at private and government institutions. Altay discovered his interest for emerging tech after seeing its wide use of area in several sectors and acknowledging its importance for the future. He received his bachelor's degree in Political Science and Public Administration from Bilkent University and he received his master's degree in International Politics from KU Leuven.

Next to Read

Comments

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

0 Comments