Chatbot Intent Recognition & 5 Intent Examples
Your chatbot misunderstands half of what customers ask. Not because the technology is bad, but because intent recognition, figuring out what users actually want, is harder than vendors admit.
When bots misinterpret intent, customers repeat themselves, abandon purchases, and switch to competitors. Fix intent recognition and you fix your bot’s biggest problem.
Types of Intent Your Bot Needs to Handle
Forget the technical classifications. Here’s what users actually try to do:
- Navigation requests – “Where’s my account settings?” Users want directions, not conversations. They’re looking for specific pages or features.
- Information hunting – “What’s your return policy?” Direct questions expecting direct answers. No small talk needed.
- Transaction attempts – “Buy two shirts, size medium.” Users ready to spend money. Don’t make them explain twice.
- Feedback dumps – “Your app crashes on iPhone 12.” Users reporting problems or sharing opinions. They want acknowledgment, not deflection.
- Support needs – “My order never arrived.” Problems requiring solutions. Users are already frustrated – don’t make it worse.
Most bots fail because they force every interaction into pre-built categories instead of recognizing what users actually need.
How do chatbots identify intent?
Figure 1. Process of intent recognition for chatbots1
NLP allows the chatbot to understand the user’s message, and machine learning classification algorithms help it classify this message based on the training data to deliver the correct response.
The steps required for the chatbot to have a meaningful conversation are:
1. Making Sense of Messy Human Language
Users don’t type perfect sentences. They use slang, make typos, skip words. NLU (Natural Language Understanding) tries to clean up this mess.
First, syntax analysis breaks sentences into pieces:
- Splits “whereismyorder” into “where is my order”
- Tags words as nouns, verbs, whatever
- Strips out filler like “um” and “like”
- Reduces “running” to “run” for consistency
Then semantic analysis figures out meaning:
- “Bank” near “money” means financial institution
- “Bank” near “river” means shoreline
- Same word, different context, different meaning
Some systems use supervised learning (SVM, Bayesian networks) for syntax. Others use unsupervised clustering for semantics. Most use both and still struggle with context.
2. Matching Input to Categories
Once the bot understands the words, it needs to match them to intentions. “I want to book a flight from Houston to LA” becomes “book_flight” intent.
Three approaches dominate:
- Pattern matching with rules (fast but rigid)
- Machine learning classifiers (flexible but needs data)
- Neural networks (accurate but resource-heavy)
The classifier compares processed input against labeled training data. More diverse training data means better matches. But even 5,000 examples per intent only gets you 98% accuracy. That 2% represents thousands of frustrated customers.
3. Picking the Right Response
Commercial bots use pre-written responses for consistency. Nobody wants their customer service bot improvising.
Responses follow decision trees:
- Escalate when stuck (“Let me connect you with an agent”)
- Gather missing information (“What’s your order number?”)
- Provide specific answers (“Returns accepted within 30 days”)
Figure 2. Key elements of a chatbot framework include Context, Intent, Prompt, Slot, Execution, and Goal. An example conversation with a real estate chatbot illustrates how conversational AI captures and processes a user’s home-buying needs to provide relevant property listings.2
Why Bots Still Fail
Language is messy. People express the same intent dozens of ways. “Cancel order,” “stop shipment,” “don’t send” – all mean the same thing to humans, not to bots.
Users compound problems with typos, incomplete sentences, multiple requests in one message. Most bots can’t handle “Check my order status and also I need to update my address.”
Three Fixes That Actually Work
1. Smart spell-checking Implement autocorrect that fixes “orddr statis” to “order status” before processing. Google Docs does this well – copy their approach.
2. Let users define custom intents Alexa lets users create custom commands. Your bot should too. Users know their needs better than your designers.
3. More training data (but the right kind) Going from 500 to 5,000 training examples cuts errors from 15% to 2%. But those examples need to reflect actual user language, not what developers think users say.
5 examples of chatbot intent recognition
Order processing intent: Focuses on processing orders and assisting users in selecting or managing purchases.
- Example Query: “Can you help me place an order for a laptop?”
Account management intent: Targets managing account details or accessing account-related information.
- Example Query: “How can I update my email address on my account?”
Appointment scheduling intent: This intent-based chatbot facilitates scheduling, rescheduling, or canceling appointments
- Example Query: “I want to book a doctor’s appointment for next Tuesday.”
Payment assistance intent: Handles payment-related issues, billing queries, or tracking payment statuses.
- Example Query: “Why was my payment declined for the recent purchase?”
Product inquiry intent: Responds to user queries about product availability, features, or specifications.
Example Query: “Do you have the latest smartphone model in stock?”
FAQ
Further reading
Find the Right VendorsReference Links
Cem's work has been cited by leading global publications including Business Insider, Forbes, Washington Post, global firms like Deloitte, HPE and NGOs like World Economic Forum and supranational organizations like European Commission. You can see more reputable companies and resources that referenced AIMultiple.
Throughout his career, Cem served as a tech consultant, tech buyer and tech entrepreneur. He advised enterprises on their technology decisions at McKinsey & Company and Altman Solon for more than a decade. He also published a McKinsey report on digitalization.
He led technology strategy and procurement of a telco while reporting to the CEO. He has also led commercial growth of deep tech company Hypatos that reached a 7 digit annual recurring revenue and a 9 digit valuation from 0 within 2 years. Cem's work in Hypatos was covered by leading technology publications like TechCrunch and Business Insider.
Cem regularly speaks at international technology conferences. He graduated from Bogazici University as a computer engineer and holds an MBA from Columbia Business School.
Be the first to comment
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.