Our analysis identified some weaknesses in Trellix’s products. Based on our DLP benchmark of top 6 DLP products, we identified the top Trellix competitors to assist businesses in finding the best DLP software and cybersecurity solution for their data protection needs.
We compare alternatives to:
Trellix DLP alternatives
| Company | Rating* | Free Trial | OS Support | Deployment** | VDI*** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys | 4.5 based on 160 reviews | ✅ On request | Windows | On-prem, Public cloud, SaaS | ✅ |
Trellix DLP | 4.2 based on 1,792 reviews | ✅ 60 | Windows | On-prem, Public cloud | ❌ |
| Teramind | 4.5 based on 223 reviews | ✅ 7 | Windows | Public cloud, SaaS | ✅ |
| Digital Guardian Endpoint DLP | 3.7 based on 63 reviews | ❌ | Windows | Public cloud, SaaS | ❌ |
* Source: Leading B2B review platforms.
** Deployment options. Cloud deployment is provided by all products.
*** VDI support: Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) is a software technology that separates the desktop environment and associated application software from the physical client device that is used to access it.
Sorting: Vendors with links to their websites are sponsors of AIMultiple and are listed at the top. The remaining products are ranked based on their total number of reviews.
Vendor selection criteria for DLP alternatives.
Trellix DLP review and shortcomings
Based in Texas, Trellix was founded in 2022 following the merger of McAfee Endpoint Security and FireEye. Trellix claims to offer data loss prevention solutions, among other cybersecurity products. Trellix is currently owned by Symphony Technology Group.
We analyzed numerous user reviews from software review platforms such as G2, Gartner, TrustRadius, and Capterra to identify some of the shortcomings highlighted by previous and current customers of Trellix’s DLP solution.
Shortcomings
1. Missing features
The Linux version lacks certain features found in the Mac and Windows versions, including malware protection. The reporting tool is quite basic and offers limited options for generating custom reports. Additionally, the pricing might be considered higher than that of competitors.
2. Declining performance
The advanced endpoint detection product has aged and struggles to meet the demand for protection against emerging security threats. While it was once highly esteemed, its effectiveness and condition have notably declined.
3. Slow & expensive
According to a review, Trellix’s product operates slowly, often fails to function correctly, and is quite expensive compared to other solutions. With so many better alternatives available, it’s surprising that this software and its company are still in business. Their success seems largely due to aggressive early marketing. Those serious about security should consider other, more effective options. Norton is not recommended.
Detailed analysis of Trellix DLP alternatives
Here, we provide a detailed analysis of the Trellix DLP alternatives based on our data-driven analysis and user reviews from platforms like G2, Gartner, TrustRadius, and Capterra.
1. Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys
Endpoint Protector or EPP is a suitable alternative to Trellix since it also offers a data protection product along with other data security solutions such as device control, content-aware protection, enforced encryption, and eDiscovery (As mentioned on its website). EPP is based in North Carolina and provides a competitive edge with its comprehensive approach to safeguarding sensitive information.
Best for: Organizations prioritizing device control and granular endpoint security.
Key features
- Comprehensive device control: Endpoint Protector offers control over 30+ types of removable devices and peripherals, including USBs, Bluetooth devices, smartphones, and more. This is the highest among all competitors. Its data classification was also accurate and performed well during our tests.
- Panic functionality: Instantly lock/wipe devices during security incidents.
- Accurate data classification: AI-driven detection of PII, financial data, and IP, protects sensitive data from unauthorized access and theft.
Strengths
- Smooth implementation: CoSoSys’s EPP offers a comprehensive DLP solution and good customer support. Reviews also highlight that its implementation team is helpful but can be improved.
- Thin client support: Ideal for virtualized environments (e.g., Citrix, VMware).
Weaknesses
- Limited cloud-native features: Less useful for cloud apps compared to competitors.
2. Teramind
Teramind is another suitable alternative for Trellix. The company was established in 2014 and is based in Miami, Florida. Teramind claims to specialize in software for insider threat management and data loss prevention for industries such as finance, retail, manufacturing, and healthcare. Its DLP solution focuses more on employee monitoring rather than comprehensive DLP policies.
Best For: Enterprises prioritizing behavioral analytics and compliance.
Key features
- Comprehensive email security solutions: Provides complete protection for email communications by detecting and blocking spam, malware, and phishing attacks.
- Advanced threat protection: Uses real-time intelligence to identify and neutralize sophisticated cyber threats before they can cause harm.
Strengths
- AI-Driven behavioral analytics: Tracks user activity (keystrokes, file transfers) in real time.
- Compliance Tools: Pre-built templates for GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS.
- Remote desktop control: Allows admins to intervene during security incidents.
Weaknesses
No Linux support: Agents unavailable for Linux endpoints.
Complex setup: Requires IT expertise for policy configuration.
3. Digital Guardian DLP
Another suitable alternative to Trellix DLP is Fortra’s Digital Guardian. Launched in 2003, the company focuses on data loss prevention solutions and is headquartered in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA. Digital Guardian offers a range of DLP solutions aimed to protect sensitive data from insider and outsider threats across endpoints, networks, and cloud applications.
Best for:
Organizations prioritizing advanced endpoint data protection and insider threat management.
Key Features:
- Granular Data Discovery: Utilizes deep content inspection and contextual analysis to identify sensitive information across endpoints, networks, and cloud environments.
- Endpoint-Centric Protection: Focuses on robust endpoint security to mitigate insider threats and prevent unauthorized data exfiltration.
- Real-Time Monitoring and Alerts: Offers continuous oversight of data movements with immediate alerts for potential breaches.
- Customizable Policy Enforcement: Enables the creation of detailed, fine-tuned policies tailored to diverse security requirements.
Strengths:
- Robust Endpoint Security: Excels in protecting endpoints, a critical vector for data loss, ensuring comprehensive defense against insider risks.
- Advanced Data Classification: Employs sophisticated algorithms for accurate identification and classification of sensitive data.
- Scalability: Well-suited for large enterprises with complex IT environments and stringent regulatory compliance needs.
Weaknesses:
- Complex Deployment: The implementation and configuration process can be challenging, often necessitating expert involvement and longer deployment timelines.
- Higher Cost: The premium pricing structure may be a barrier for smaller organizations or those with tight budgets.
- User Interface Limitations: Some users find the interface less intuitive, potentially requiring additional training and support to navigate effectively.
Vendor selection criteria for DLP alternatives
This section explains the criteria used to compare the vendors in the table. To organize the criteria, we separate them into market presence and commercials, and features categories.
Market presence & commercials
1. Number of reviews: A higher number of reviews indicates a broader picture of a vendor’s performance and user comments on specific products. We considered vendors with over 100 total reviews.
2. User ratings: This metric reflects the company’s performance, including its DLP tool and its effectiveness against cyber threats. We included vendors with a score of 4 or higher.
3. Pricing: Considering the potential cost of DLP solutions, obtaining pricing information before purchasing is crucial. Most vendors provide pricing details upon request.
4. Free trial: A free trial allows companies to experience the software firsthand, ensuring it meets their protection needs against cyber attacks and infected files, before committing.
Features
5. Supported OS: Compatibility with multiple operating systems like Windows, Mac, Linux, and Thin Client is essential to provide excellent protection across various computing environments within an organization.
6. Deployment options: The ability to choose between different deployment methods enables the DLP tool to integrate seamlessly with an organization’s IT infrastructure, addressing unique security requirements and offering more features and frequent updates.
Trellix complete security platform alternatives
These are alternatives to the Trellix complete security platform.
| Vendor | Offerings | # of Employees |
|---|---|---|
| Cisco Secure Endpoint | – Endpoint Protection | 10k+ |
| CrowdStrike | – Endpoint Protection | 9k+ |
| Trellix | – Endpoint Security | 3.5k+ |
| SentinelOne | – Detection and Response | 2.5k+ |
- Vendor inclusion requirements:
- 2500+ employees
- Similarity between offerings
- Sorting is based on the number of employees
FAQs for Trellix review
-
Is McAfee the same as Trellix?
The new company, which was formed from the merger of McAfee Endpoint Security and FireEye, is called Trellix.
-
Why are we looking at Trellix alternatives?
Analysis of user reviews has identified some drawbacks of working with Trellix endpoint security. Despite claiming to offer excellent protection against cyber threats through advanced machine learning and antivirus software, the high purchase cost and performance issues of Trellix’s endpoint security and DLP solutions are noted as significant barriers.
Therefore, comparing Trellix with top alternatives could provide both existing and potential customers with more cost-effective and overall better options that still meet their data protection needs.
-
Why use a DLP software like Trellix or Endpoint Protector?
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is vital for safeguarding sensitive information against advanced cyber threats, including unauthorized access and sophisticated cyber attacks. These solutions are pivotal in endpoint security, protecting data across various endpoint devices, from office environments to mobile devices accessed remotely.
DLP tools leverage advanced machine learning and behavioral analytics to detect unusual patterns indicative of potential breaches, such as infected files or irregular data transfers.
This enhances malware detection and helps defend against advanced threats, including zero-day exploits and ransomware attacks. The integration of DLP with other security tools facilitates a comprehensive security posture that is crucial for maintaining complete visibility and protection across network devices and cloud workloads.
The user-friendly interface of DLP systems ensures that both end-users and IT security teams can effectively manage security protocols and incident responses. These systems are designed to be highly scalable, adapting to enterprise networks and supporting automated responses to detected threats, providing endpoint protection and advanced threat detection repeatedly.
Overall, DLP solutions offer a robust platform for compliance management, vulnerability management, and threat intelligence, continually updating to address the latest cyber threats and ensuring that organizations maintain a resilient defense against both known and unknown threats.
Through real-time protection and advanced detection capabilities, DLP ensures complete protection, making it a comprehensive solution for endpoint security and data protection.
Comments
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.