Stonebranch is a SaaS workload automation solution with a wide range of community-driven pre-packaged integrations. However, it has alternatives that may suit specific users. See our rationale for selecting each tool by following the links below:
| Stonebranch Alternatives | Focus | |
|---|---|---|
1. | Hybrid cloud / API orchestration | |
2. | Orchestration of SAP jobs while keeping a clean SAP core | |
3. | PowerShell integration and job scheduling management on the .NET framework | |
4. | ||
5. | Job orchestration in the IBM ecosystem | |
~30 WLA tools exist in the workload automation software landscape. We analyze each competitor’s features, user reviews and market presence signals to identify its strengths and advantages, allowing businesses to narrow down their shortlist.
Comparison of Stonebranch UAC and Top 5 Alternatives
| Vendor | Rating* | Deployment |
|---|---|---|
| ActiveBatch | 4.4 based on 251 reviews | On-prem, Public cloud |
| RunMyJobs by Redwood | 4.8 based on 140 reviews | On-prem, Public cloud, SaaS |
| Fortra’s JAMS | 4.7 based on 142 reviews | On-prem, Public cloud |
| Stonebranch UAC | 4.8 based on 79 reviews | On-prem, Public cloud, SaaS |
| IBM Workload Automation | 4.4 based on 13 reviews | On-prem, Public cloud |
| Control-M | 4.7 based on 150 reviews | On-prem, Public cloud |
*Ratings are based on Capterra, Gartner, G2, TrustRadius, and Peerspot. Tools with links are sponsors of AIMultiple. The ranking is first based on sponsorship level, then the average rating.
Stonebranch UAC Review
Stonebranch allows users to integrate with various platforms and applications through pre-packaged integrations, custom-built solutions, or community-driven integration blueprints available in the open-source Stonebranch Integration Hub.
The Integration Hub categorizes integrations into two types:
- Stonebranch Certified: These integrations meet Stonebranch’s functional and security testing requirements. Support is provided under Stonebranch’s Global Support Policy.
- Community Created: Developed by the UAC community, these integrations go through a limited review before being published. Support is provided on a best-effort basis and is not covered by Stonebranch’s Global Support Policy.
The platform also offers visual dashboards and drill-down reports for real-time monitoring and SLA tracking, along with the ability to integrate with services like SAP S/4HANA.
Check the video below to see their services:
Pros:
- Stonebranch UAC has real-time visibility into IT processes. This feature helps users monitor and manage their IT operations on time.
- Many users have reported that Stonebranch UAC provides a user-friendly interface and intuitive controls. (See Figure 1)
- The platform offers robust API support, making integrating with other systems and applications possible.
Cons:
- Some users have reported that the initial setup of Stonebranch UAC can be complex and time-consuming. This could be a drawback for businesses that aim to get up to speed quickly.
Figure 1: A technical analyst’s review of Stonebranch
Source: G21
5 Alternatives to Stonebranch
1-ActiveBatch
ActiveBatch offers an easy-to-use workload orchestration platform for enterprises with a wide range of integrations
Pros
Flexibility: Its Flow Control Job Steps feature allows users to control script execution in a flexible manner (e.g. with operators like ForEachRow and If-Branch) based on specific conditions or dependencies.
Ease of use: ActiveBatch has an intuitive low-code interface that offers drag-and-drop features and doesn’t require high technical skills. (See Figure 2) It supports various enterprise applications and can perform command-line operations while remaining user-friendly. Existing open-source job scheduling solutions can be incorporated or simplified within the ActiveBatch framework.
Figure 2: ActiveBatch
Source: ActiveBatch
API integrations: Its Super REST API adapter allows users to make AWS API calls using the AWS signature.
Ease of migration: ActiveBatch supports command-line operations, enabling the integration of existing automation from open-source job schedulers into the ActiveBatch platform.
Wide-OS support: ActiveBatch supports various platforms, including Windows, Unix, Linux, UNIX, Mac OS, and IBM iSeries AS/400. This makes it a versatile tool for heterogeneous IT environments.
Cons
- Although ActiveBatch supports integration with external tools and systems, this process could be further refined.2
2-RunMyJobs by Redwood
RunMyJobs, a software as a service (SaaS) platform, is devised to automate workloads, allowing users to integrate different systems and data, irrespective of the size or complexity of their IT landscape. RunMyJobs enables a connection between on-premise and private cloud SaaS solutions. A free trial is available on-demand for those keen on trying out the job scheduling solution.
RunMyJobs has direct, ready-to-use integrations that allow it to manage tasks on S/4HANA or BTP. As a result, users can automate tasks without the need for specific software installations. It also boasts SAP-approved connections with RISE and SAP S/4HANA Cloud.
Pros
- RunMyJobs allows for the creation of adaptable workflows and the efficient setup of robust parallel and dependent processes.
- It can effortlessly connect with various external or legacy systems, ensuring no delays once a job is scheduled and no work interruption.
- It has advanced functionalities like dashboards, logging, and load balancing.
- It’s compatible with all internet browsers and hybrid environments.
Cons
- The generation of metrics and statistics has room for improvement.3
- Alert services and reporting capabilities could be improved.4
Choose RunMyJobs for industry-leading SAP integrations delivered as SaaS
3-Fortra’s JAMS
JAMS Scheduler’s functionality extends to the creation, execution, and supervision of job sequences and workflows. It is compatible with multiple platforms, such as Windows, UNIX, Linux, and IBM, as well as SQL Server, Oracle, and SAP applications. The JAMS User Interface is depicted in Figure 1.
Fortra’s JAMS leverages PowerShell by being constructed on the .NET framework, similar to PowerShell. The JAMS module offers over 50 cmdlets, enabling users to manage, maintain, and administer JAMS directly via PowerShell.
Figure 1: JAMS Scheduler UI
Pros:
- An IT director mentioned that Fortra’s JAMS integrates seamlessly with OpenVMS through a native agent, making it one of the few solutions available that offer this capability.
- The menu is customizable and intuitive.
Cons:
- An analyst at a healthcare organization noted that the intricate configurations of JAMS Scheduler can be difficult for new users to master quickly. This can lead to slower organizational adoption and require additional training and resources.
- Error messages are generic and could be improved.
You can read our JAMS Scheduler alternatives article.
Choose JAMS for PowerShell integration and job scheduling management on the .NET framework
4-BMC Control-M
Control-M is versatile, deployable on any cloud, and available as a SaaS offering. It provides native integration with major cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and Google. Additionally, it connects seamlessly with data platforms such as Airflow, Snowflake, and Azure Data Factory, among others. A free trial is available upon request.
You can read more about Control-M and its alternatives;
Pros:
- Control-M provides central monitoring, is easy to use, and can integrate with multiple ITIL management tools.
- The file transfer component is valuable
Cons:
- A senior DevOps manager pointed out that the tool has limited API capabilities and integration options with other applications.
- Stability issues are present at times.
5-IBM Workload Automation
IBM Workload Automation is an enterprise job scheduling software crafted by IBM. Its purpose is to aid enterprises in managing and automating their intricate workload ecosystems spanning various systems, platforms, and applications.
This software is a unified, scalable answer for scheduling and executing various jobs, tasks, and procedures in distributed settings. It possesses multiple features and functionalities to enhance workload execution, boost efficiency, and help complete vital business operations punctually.
Pros:
- Users report that the tool offers a REST API interface, conveniently front-ended with Swagger, which simplifies development and testing processes. Additionally, the product performs effectively in both data center and cloud environments, including Kubernetes.
- Easy-to-use, simple yet effective user interface.
Cons:
- An assistant system manager observes that IBM Workload Automation lacks integration with third-party tools and has inadequate documentation, limiting the use of its features. They also recommend launching a mobile app for easier and quicker access.
- Working with REST API and getting responses still requires some manual activities, and optimization is required.
More alternatives
Stonebranch is a workload automation tool with functionality that can be categorized under the categories below. You can learn about more alternatives in the pages that explain a few top vendors in detail:
Or check out complete vendor lists in these categories:
AIMultiple analyzed market leading WLA vendors using relevant, public, and verifiable criteria covering vendor market presence and functionality. You can download the whitepaper to identify the market leaders to help you find the right vendor.
Transparency Statement
Numerous emerging tech firms, such as Redwood, are sponsors of AIMultiple.
Comments
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.