- Tech companies rarely offer “success-based pricing for AI agents”. Only a handful of companies offer pricing options for customers to select their preferred model.
- Buyers need transparent pricing to determine the exact value of AI agents on user-based subscriptions. The value of AI, automation, and APIs, no longer correlates with the number of subscribed users.
Companies are increasingly shifting to dynamic pricing models, allowing buyers to choose their costs based on specific needs and usage patterns. In this article, we listed the newest AI agent pricing examples and explained the evolution of pricing models:
AI agent pricing examples
| AI agent | Pricing example | Pricing model | Pay per |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salesforce Agentforce | $2 per conversation | Usage-based | Workflow |
| Microsoft Copilot | $4 per hour | Usage-based | Action |
| GPT researcher | ~$0.4 per research* | Usage-based | Action |
| OpenAI Operator | Input: $15 / 1M tokens; Output: $60 / 1M tokens** | Usage-based | Action |
| Kittl | 20 AI credits per image generation | Usage-based | Action |
| Devin – Cognition AI | $2.25 per AI credit | Usage-based | Action |
| Intercom – FinAI agent | $29 per agent/month | Digital AI agent seats (AI agents as a user) | AI agent seats (Fixed fee) |
| Intercom – FinAI agent | $0.99 per successful resolution | Outcome based | Successful task completion |
| Sierra AI | Per successful resolution | Outcome based | Successful task completion |
| Zendesk AI | Per successful resolution | Outcome based | Successful task completion |
*(using o3-mini on “high” reasoning effort)
**(using 4o-mini)
Usage-based pricing:
- Workflow-based pricing: Charge per conversation (e.g., customer service interactions)
- Time-based pricing: Charges for the time the AI agent runs — e.g., per hour or minute.
- Credit-based pricing: Customers spend pre-purchased credits tied to specific tasks or actions completed by the AI (e.g., generating a report or creating a video).
- Token-based pricing: Costs scale with the number of tokens (words/characters) processed — common in LLM APIs.
Outcome-based pricing:
Costs as per pre-agreed business benefit delivered by the AI agent. Pricing is based on success fees.
Digital AI agent seats (AI agents as a user)
AI agents are considered unique “users” with their own API access keys. Each AI agent gets its seat, which grants them specific access to platform resources like a human user. For example, Intercom’s FinAI has a base monthly fee of $29 per agent month.1
This pricing model offers a more predictable cost structure similar to seat-based SaaS pricing.
The evolution of pricing models
| Aspect | Traditional seat-based models | Usage-based models | Outcome-based models | Digital AI agent seats (AI agents as a user) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing driver | # human users/seats | Actions performed or time used | Successful outcomes | Tasks/actions executed by AI agents |
| Unit of value | User license | API calls, minutes, tokens | Completed tasks, resolutions, conversions | Agent activity (tickets resolved, workflows run) |
| Cost predictability | High (fixed monthly/annual contracts) | Medium (depends on activity) | Low to medium (based on outcomes) | Variable—linked to AI agent workload |
Historically, software pricing relied on per-seat subscriptions, charging fees for each human user accessing the platform.
The shift in pricing models
The traditional per-seat model is becoming outdated as AI agents take over human tasks.
- Companies like Salesforce ($2 per conversation) and Microsoft ($4 per hour) have adopted usage-based pricing.
- Newer players like Intercom ($0.99 per resolution), and Zendesk focus on outcome-based pricing.
- Some vendors like Devin’s Cognition AI ($2.25 per “agent compute unit”) and Kittl’s (20 credits per image generation) are adapting to dynamic usage-based pricing models where they normalize the measure of the resources AI credits.
- SaaS vendors like Intercom are exploring new licensing models, ‘digital seats” where AI agents operate with their own seats and usage rights.
Do AI agent pricing models deliver fair value?
Usage-based pricing
For customers with predictable workloads, usage-based pricing can deliver measurable results.
However, if usage fluctuates (e.g., due to unpredictable demand), cost control becomes more challenging. In such cases, AI agents may become under-utilized.
To address this, some vendors offer:
- Hybrid pricing models: Combining usage-based pricing with a flat-rate baseline or tiered pricing. For example, you pay a fixed base price for regular usage, but usage beyond a certain threshold incurs additional charges.
- Predictive models and cost forecasting: Some platforms are adding tools that help businesses forecast their AI usage costs based on historical data.
Outcome-based pricing
Outcome-based pricing is highly adaptive and suitable in case of undefined scope or fluctuating workflow volumes.
However;
- Most vendors delivering success-based pricing require an upfront seat-based subscription.
- Implementing success-based billing would be challenging, primarily because defining what a “resolution” is often subjective and open to debate.
Some AI agent providers, like Intercom, address this issue by clearly defining what constitutes a “resolution.”
“A resolution is counted when, following Fin’s last answer in a conversation, the customer confirms the answer provided is satisfactory (hard resolution) or exits the conversation without requesting further assistance (soft resolution).
Customers can confirm an answer is satisfactory by:
- Pressing the That helped 👍 quick reply.
- Entering an affirmative response such as ‘Yes’, ‘Sure’ etc.” 2
→ Intercom’s approach of defining what constitutes a “resolution” brings measurable success in AI-driven customer interactions, yet there are still downsides to success-based such as over-simplification or potential for gaming the system.
Other challenges of AI agent pricing models
- Billing disputes: Tracking usage and success metrics across multiple billing models
- Employee training: Training customer representatives on how to present both pricing models.
- Revenue prediction: Financial planning relies on historical data, but with fluctuating usage and success rates, predicting revenue becomes more challenging.
Hidden AI agent costs
Professional services & implementation fees
Custom setup, workflow configuration, and integration into internal systems can cost about $10,000 to over $200,000 annually.
Ongoing optimization & tuning
AI agents aren’t “set and forget.” Regular updates, prompt tuning, retraining, and performance monitoring require dedicated ML engineers and operations — especially at scale.
Base license fees
Most AI agent providers charge base license fees (e.g., $5,000–$50,000/year) on top of usage. OpenAI could charge up to $20,000/month for some of its more specialized AI agents.3
Data preparation
AI agents rely on clean, labeled data — but most internal data is unstructured. Preparing it requires costly tools, expert time, and often manual labeling.
Further reading
- Compare 20+ AI Agent Tools in 2025
- Top 35+ Generative AI Tools by Popularity & Category [’25]
- AI Agents: Operator vs Browser Use vs Project Mariner [’25]
Comments
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.