Top 3 Trellix Competitors & Alternatives in 2024: Review Analysis
He holds a BA and an MSc from Cardiff University, UK and has over 2 years of experience as a research analyst in B2B tech.
Businesses must prioritize safeguarding against increasingly frequent and sophisticated cyber attacks. Data Loss Prevention or DLP software serves as a robust solution, monitoring data flows, identifying unauthorized access, and proactively preventing intrusions to protect confidential or sensitive data.
Trellix (previously McAfee endpoint security) is a popular provider of cybersecurity and data loss prevention software. However, our analysis revealed certain limitations within Trellix’s DLP product, which could lead potential customers to consider alternative solutions.
This article offers a comparison of the top competitors & alternatives to Trellix, analyzed based on around 1000 user reviews and a detailed review of the company, to help business leaders find the right tool to safeguard their sensitive data.
Please see:
- solutions that have similar capabilities to Trellix’s complete platform
- alternatives to Trellix’s DLP.
Top 3 alternatives of Trellix Platform
These are alternatives to the Trellix platform, which offers similar cybersecurity.
Table 1. Alternative for Trellix’s platform
| Vendor | Offerings |
|---|---|
| Trellix | – Endpoint Security – Network Security – Data Protection |
| CrowdStrike | – Endpoint Protection – Threat Intelligence – Cloud Security |
| SentinelOne | – Detection and Response – Identity Threat Detection & Response – Data Recovery & Ransomware Protection |
| Cisco Secure Endpoint | – Endpoint Protection – Extended Detection & Response – Mobile Device Management |
Top 3 alternatives of Trellix DLP
Table 2. Alternatives comparison for DLP solutions
| Company | # of Reviews* | User Rating* | Pricing** | Free Trial | Supported OS | Deployement Options |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys | 179 | 4.3 | Custom | ✅ | Windows Mac Linux Thin Client | On-premise VDI Cloud SaaS |
| Trellix DLP (McAfee) | 305 | 4.0 | N/A | ✖ | Windows Mac | On-premise VDI Cloud SaaS |
| Teramind | 224 | 4.4 | $73 – $170 /month | ✅ | Windows Mac | On-premise Cloud |
| Digital Guardian Endpoint DLP | 144 | 3.9 | N/A | ✖ | Windows Mac Linux | On-premise Cloud SaaS |
* The data was gathered from leading B2B review platforms.
** The pricing plans may vary based on different business needs therefore, we suggest you to contact the vendor to get more accurate pricing.
Notes for the table:
- The table was created from publically available and verifiable data.
- Only alternatives with 100+ total user reviews were added to the table.
- The vendors are ranked based on the total # of reviews apart from the sponsored vendors.
- Transparency statement: Vendors with links to their websites are sponsors of AIMultiple
Vendor selection criteria
This section explains the criteria used to compare the vendors in the table. To organize the criteria, we separate them into market presence and commercials, and features categories.
Market presence & commercials
1. Number of reviews: A higher number of reviews indicates a broader picture of a vendor’s performance and user comments on specific products. We considered vendors with over 100 total reviews.
2. User ratings: This metric reflects the company’s performance, including its DLP tool and its effectiveness against cyber threats. We included vendors with a score of 4 or higher.
3. Pricing: Considering the potential cost of DLP solutions, obtaining pricing information before purchasing is crucial. Most vendors provide pricing details upon request.
4. Free trial: A free trial allows companies to experience the software firsthand, ensuring it meets their protection needs against cyber attacks and infected files, before committing.
Features
5. Supported OS: Compatibility with multiple operating systems like Windows, Mac, Linux, and Thin Client is essential to provide excellent protection across various computing environments within an organization.
6. Deployment options: The ability to choose between different deployment methods enables the DLP tool to integrate seamlessly with an organization’s IT infrastructure, addressing unique security requirements and offering more features and frequent updates.
Trellix review and shortcomings
Based in Texas, Trellix was founded in 2022 following the merger of McAfee Endpoint Security and FireEye. Trellix claims to offer data loss prevention solutions, among other cybersecurity products. Trellix is currently owned by Symphony Technology Group. We analyzed numerous user reviews from software review platforms such as G2, Gartner, TrustRadius, and Capterra to identify some of the shortcomings highlighted by previous and current customers of Trellix’s DLP solution.
Shortcomings
1. Missing features
The Linux version lacks certain features found in the Mac and Windows versions, including malware protection. The reporting tool is quite basic and offers limited options for generating custom reports. Additionally, the pricing might be considered higher than that of competitors.1
2. Declining performance
The advanced endpoint detection product has aged and struggles to meet the demand for protection against emerging security threats. While it was once highly esteemed, its effectiveness and condition have notably declined.2
3. Slow & expensive
According to a review, Trellix’s product operates slowly, often fails to function correctly, and is quite expensive compared to other solutions. With so many better alternatives available, it’s surprising that this software and its company are still in business. Their success seems largely due to aggressive early marketing. Those serious about security should consider other, more effective options. Norton is not recommended..3
Detailed analysis of the top Trellix alternatives
This section offers a detailed analysis of the top 3 Trellix alternatives listed and compared in Table 1. We analyzed around 1000 user reviews to identify the main pros and cons of each of the alternatives. We analyzed reviews from platforms like G2, Gartner, TrustRadius, and Capterra. We only focused on reviews related to its DLP solutions.
1. Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys
Endpoint Protector or EPP is a suitable alternative to Trellix since it also offers a data protection product along with other data security solutions such as device control, content-aware protection, enforced encryption, and eDiscovery (As mentioned on its website). EPP is based in North Carolina and provides a competitive edge with its comprehensive approach to safeguarding sensitive information.
Pros
1. Strong OS support
As compared to other alternatives and Trellix, Endpoint Protector’s solution supports the most number of operating systems, including Thin Clients.
2. Granular solution with fast-updates
Endpoint’s DLP product is praised for its granularity, effective group administration, fast updates, and unique panic functionality.4
3. Smooth implementation and strong customer support
CoSoSys’s EPP offers a comprehensive DLP solution and good customer support. Reviews also highlight that its implementation team is helpful.5
Cons
1. Integration issues with Google Workspace
The review criticizes the product’s lack of integration with Google Workspace and ticketing systems. When end users request temporary permission for an external or blocked device, the product directs them to their default email app instead of using Google Workspace, which is the system the reviewer’s organization employs.6
2. False positives in file sharing
The review acknowledges the product’s positive features but points out some issues. Firstly, there are frequent false positives in file-sharing alerts from a specific application, occurring even when the user isn’t logged into the application. Secondly, there is a discrepancy between the activities performed by users and the activities that are logged by the system.7
2. Teramind
Teramind is another suitable alternative for Trellix. The company was established in 2014 and is based in Miami, Florida. Teramind claims to specialize in software for insider threat management and data loss prevention for industries such as finance, retail, manufacturing, and healthcare.
Pros
This section highlights some pros and cons of Teramind, identified by analyzing user reviews from platforms like G2, Gartner, TrustRadius, and Capterra.
1. Effective user monitoring
A customer review commented about Teramind’s positive user monitoring capabilities.8
2. Easy-to-use UI
A customer found its user interface easy to use, and its customer support helpful.9
Cons
1. Weak DLP features
A customer pointed out that Teramind’s data loss prevention features need improvement and lack Linux support.10
2. Sudden monitoring halts
A customer identified that its DLP solution often stopped monitoring and they had to reinstall the software to make it work again.11
3. Expensive
Some customers found the DLP solution more expensive than other options on the market.12
3. Digital Guardian DLP
Another suitable alternative to Trellix DLP is Fortra’s Digital Guardian. Launched in 2003, the company focuses on data loss prevention solutions and is headquartered in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA. Digital Guardian offers a range of DLP solutions aimed to protect sensitive data from insider and outsider threats across endpoints, networks, and cloud applications.
Pros
1. Comprehensiveness
The review praises Digital Guardian for its comprehensive DLP capabilities, emphasizing its effectiveness in securing sensitive data across various platforms and its advanced analytics that enhance visibility into organizational data usage.13
Cons
1. Complex solution
Many users described the solution as complex to use and difficult to set up.14 15 16
2. Scaling challenges
Some reviewers claim that Digital Guardian’s DLP functionalities are effective, but scaling up the number of agents requires additional support to keep up.17 18
FAQs for Trellix review
-
Is McAfee the same as Trellix?
The new company, which was formed from the merger of McAfee Endpoint Security and FireEye, is called Trellix.
-
Why are we looking at Trellix alternatives?
Analysis of user reviews has identified some drawbacks of working with Trellix endpoint security. Despite claiming to offer excellent protection against cyber threats through advanced machine learning and antivirus software, the high purchase cost and performance issues of Trellix’s endpoint security and DLP solutions are noted as significant barriers. Therefore, comparing Trellix with top alternatives could provide both existing and potential customers with more cost-effective and overall better options that still meet their data protection needs.
-
Why use a DLP software like Trellix or Endpoint Protector?
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is vital for safeguarding sensitive information against advanced cyber threats, including unauthorized access and sophisticated cyber attacks. These solutions are pivotal in endpoint security, protecting data across various endpoint devices, from office environments to mobile devices accessed remotely.
DLP tools leverage advanced machine learning and behavioral analytics to detect unusual patterns indicative of potential breaches, such as infected files or irregular data transfers. This enhances malware detection and helps defend against advanced threats, including zero-day exploits and ransomware attacks. The integration of DLP with other security tools facilitates a comprehensive security posture that is crucial for maintaining complete visibility and protection across network devices and cloud workloads.
The user-friendly interface of DLP systems ensures that both end-users and IT security teams can effectively manage security protocols and incident responses. These systems are designed to be highly scalable, adapting to enterprise networks and supporting automated responses to detected threats, providing endpoint protection and advanced threat detection repeatedly.
Overall, DLP solutions offer a robust platform for compliance management, vulnerability management, and threat intelligence, continually updating to address the latest cyber threats and ensuring that organizations maintain a resilient defense against both known and unknown threats. Through real-time protection and advanced detection capabilities, DLP ensures complete protection, making it a comprehensive solution for endpoint security and data protection.
Further reading
- Tackling Critical Data Protection Challenges
- Top 10 LLM DLP Best Practices
- Top 7 AI DLP Best Practices with Case Studies
If you need further help in finding a vendor or have any questions, feel free to contact us:
External resources
- 1. Trellix negative review 1. Gartner. Accessed: 09/April/2024.
- 2. Trellix negative review 2. Gartner. Accessed: 09/April/2024.
- 3. Trellix negative review 3. Capterra. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 4. Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys customer review 1. G2. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 5. Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys customer review 2. Gartner. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 6. Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys negative customer review 1. Gartner. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 7. Endpoint Protector by CoSoSys negative customer review 2. Gartner. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 8. Teramind positive customer review 1. G2. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 9. Teramind customer review 2. G2. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 10. Teramind negative review 1. G2. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 11. Teramind negative review 2. G2. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 12. Teramind negative review 3. Capterra. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 13. Digital Guardian’s positive review 1. G2. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 14. “Eliminating cyber threat successfully”. G2. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 15. “The best alternative in protecting business data”. G2. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 16. “Review of Digital Guardian”. Capterra. Accessed: 31/March/2024.
- 17. “Very Comprehensive Tool”. G2. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
- 18. “Classification and Tagging, the most flexible feature of Digital Guardian Next Gen DLP”. G2. Accessed: 15/April/2024.
Comments
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.