AIMultiple ResearchAIMultiple Research

Top 5 LiveAction Competitors in 2024 Based on 2.5K Reviews

Updated on Apr 17
6 min read
Written by
Cem Dilmegani
Cem Dilmegani
Cem Dilmegani

Cem is the principal analyst at AIMultiple since 2017. AIMultiple informs hundreds of thousands of businesses (as per Similarweb) including 60% of Fortune 500 every month.

Cem's work has been cited by leading global publications including Business Insider, Forbes, Washington Post, global firms like Deloitte, HPE, NGOs like World Economic Forum and supranational organizations like European Commission. You can see more reputable companies and media that referenced AIMultiple.

View Full Profile

LiveAction network monitors have become popular over 2023. Users view LiveAction LiveNX as an easy-to-use monitoring and management software.

Below, we identified top LiveAction competitors that address these shortcomings which may be attractive for users who are looking to buy a new solution or switch from LiveAction LiveNX to another solution.

Top 5 LiveAction Competitors

NPM Software# of employees# of B2B reviewsAverage rating (out of 5)
AKIPS158
4.7
LiveAction LiveNX13164.4
Atera3007494.6
Auvik3362664.6
Datadog6,1006754.4
NinjaOne9091,1874.8

* Ratings are based on Capterra and G2. The alternatives are listed alphabetically, with AKIPS which is a AIMultiple’s sponsor at the top. The number of employees are retrieved from LinkedIn. 

Evaluation of LiveAction LiveNX Network Monitor

LiveAction LiveNX is a network performance and analytics platform. LiveNX offers features such as detailed flow visualization, quality of service (QoS) analytics, and interactive topology maps. These enable IT teams to diagnose and resolve network issues.

Pros

1- Ease of use and user interface: Multiple users appreciate the user-friendly GUI and the ease of operating the platform, making daily tasks like fetching reports and monitoring devices.G21

2- Effective monitoring and troubleshooting: LiveNX is highly regarded for its real-time monitoring capabilities, especially for customer edge routers, and its efficiency in troubleshooting, particularly during the early stages of QoS and SDWAN deployment.G22

3- Support and updates: Users are satisfied with the level of support provided by LiveNX, including quick response times and the frequency of updates that introduce performance enhancements and new features.

Cons

1-Need for improvement in features: While the GUI is generally liked, users see room for improvement, particularly in aspects like automation capabilities, including running global scripts and network device backups.G23

2- Complexity: Some users find the platform not as intuitive for advanced tasks, such as detailed reporting, which requires logging into a separate dashboard. The steep learning curve and lack of user-friendliness in some areas are also mentioned as drawbacks.

live action competitors

Figure 1. User review on LiveAction LiveNX

Source: G24

Evaluation of LiveAction Alternatives

1- AKIPS

AKIPS is specialized in enhancing network performance and monitoring. They offer a complimentary trial period. AKIPS compares its own product to LiveAction as in the figure below:

AKIPS is one of the LiveAction competitors

Figure 2. How AKIPS compares its own product to LiveAction

Source: AKIPS 5

Pros

1- Effective network management: Excels in managing extensive networks efficiently through refined SNMP data extraction techniques.

2- Simple installation and operation: Renowned for its direct installation process and easy integration with diverse systems.

3- Adaptability and comprehensive analysis: Provides a range of customization options along with detailed analytical reports.

Cons

Interface usability: The graphical user interface could be challenging for users without technical expertise. Some users noted the lack of a cohesive visual representation of the network.

A review about AKIPS network monitoring software

Figure 3. Customer review on AKIPS

Source: Capterra6

2- Atera

Atera offers a cloud solution for IT management, combining Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM), Professional Services Automation (PSA), and remote access features.

Pros

1- User-Friendly design and implementation: Atera is widely recognized for its intuitive interface, which simplifies the setup process. This ease of implementation allows for quick integration with systems like Microsoft Azure and UniFi. The platform’s user-friendliness is further supported by its mobile and web apps.

2- All-Inclusive IT oversight and management: The platform is valued for its range of features including remote monitoring and management, automatic ticket generation, notifications, and compatibility with numerous applications. Its capability for delivering instant updates and streamlining operations is considered a key asset in the efficient administration of IT tasks.

3- Customer assistance: The platform offers an accessible and supportive customer service team, which is crucial for troubleshooting and maximizing platform utilization.

Cons

1- Restrictions in features: Despite the acclaim for its diverse features, some users point out Atera’s shortcomings in areas like in-depth reporting and analytical capabilities. 

2- Reporting limitations: The platform’s generated reports are perceived as superficial, posing challenges for IT departments in conducting thorough analyses. Furthermore, there’s room for improvement in Atera’s ticketing and support features to better the user experience and operational effectiveness.

Figure 4. User review on Atera

Source: Capterra7

3- Auvik

Auvik is a cloud-based software designed for monitoring network performance. According to the company’s claim, it is particularly beneficial for businesses with multiple locations, including advanced traffic analysis in its premium offerings.

Pros

1- In-depth network mapping: The software is valued for its detailed and user-friendly network visualizations and live diagrams.

2- Straightforward setup and operation: Auvik’s setup simplicity, user-friendly design, and compatibility with a wide range of network devices and systems are highly regarded.

3- Critical network insights: Auvik offers essential information on network structures. This enhances the documentation process and aiding technicians in problem-solving.

Cons

1- Complexity: For some users, Auvik’s comprehensive feature set and complexity can make it challenging to use. 

2- Excessive notifications: The high volume of alerts is considered overwhelming by some customers.

Figure 5. Customer review on Auvik

Source: G28

4- Datadog

Datadog serves as a platform for monitoring and analyzing the health and security of cloud-scale applications, by consolidating information from servers, containers, databases, and third-party services.

Pros

1- Intuitive design and easy operation: Datadog is recommended for its interface, easy navigation, and the simplicity of configuring monitors, dashboards, and notifications.

2- Extensive monitoring with immediate insights: The platform is consistently recognized for its ability to deliver instant visibility into application performance, infrastructure health, and log data. With its monitoring tools like log management, application performance monitoring (APM), and infrastructure metrics, Datadog facilitates prompt issue resolution and enhances system performance.

3- Effortless integration: Datadog’s ability to integrate smoothly with numerous other tools and services is often praised makes it a versatile option in varied IT ecosystems.

4- Adaptable features: The platform’s customization features, particularly for dashboards and metrics, are seen as a key benefit, enabling users to modify the tool to meet their specific monitoring requirements.

Cons

1- Pricing concerns: Many reviews express concerns about Datadog’s pricing, which is perceived as being on the higher side in comparison to other similar platforms.

2- Documentation and learning curve: The platform’s extensive documentation and the initial learning curve for newcomers are identified as potential obstacles.

Figure 6. User review on Datadog

Source: Capterra9

5- NinjaOne

NinjaOne stands out as an inclusive IT operations platform. It incorporates a network performance monitoring solution with an array of functionalities, such as remote monitoring and management (RMM), patch management, and backup services.

Pros

1- Simplicity in deployment and operation: The platform is valued for its uncomplicated installation process and efficient scripting capabilities, making it user-friendly.

2- Integration and reliable support: NinjaOne is recognized for its integration capabilities and its exceptional customer service, which includes access to dedicated account representatives.

3- All-in-one monitoring and administration: It offers comprehensive insights and governance across the entire network setup, boasting functionalities like remote desktop access and efficient patch management.

Cons

Challenges with automation and detailed reporting: Some users point out that the automation functions could be more user-friendly and advocate for enhanced reporting features and better integration with scripts.

Figure 7. User review on NinjaOne

Source: G210

FAQs

What is LiveAction, and why look for its alternatives?

LiveAction is a wireless network management system that offers performance monitoring capabilities, network analytics software, and tools to optimize mobile network quality. LiveAction offers a plenty of products for network management:

  • LiveNX, for network monitoring
  • LiveWire, for network forensics
  • ThreatEye, for network detection and response

While LiveAction provides a platform to test network performance and perform robust network diagnostics with specialized network engineer tools, businesses might seek alternatives for various reasons. These could include the need for a different set of features, more cost-effective solutions, or platforms that offer better integration with their existing enterprise infrastructure. Alternatives might also offer more specialized capabilities in areas like global network monitoring, dynamic analysis of service performance, or enhanced network security features.

What are the key considerations when choosing a LiveAction competitor?

When evaluating LiveAction competitors, key considerations should include the ability to provide reliable network performance insights and address both network and device problems effectively. The chosen solution should allow for the deployment of physical or virtual device monitoring agents to track key business metrics and ensure optimal enterprise infrastructure performance. It’s essential to consider whether the competitor offers powerful performance monitoring capability, supports network security measures, and can optimize mobile network quality. 

Where can I find more information and user reviews about these LiveAction competitors?

For more information and user reviews about LiveAction competitors, consider exploring IT and network professional forums, industry-specific online communities, and professional networking groups dedicated to network management and monitoring. 

Websites that specialize in software reviews and comparisons, like G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius, can be valuable resources for detailed analyses and user experiences. These platforms often feature comprehensive reviews that cover various aspects, including the deployment of network monitoring agents, optimization of mobile network quality, network analytics capabilities, and network security features. They also provide insights into how well these solutions perform robust network diagnostics and track key business metrics, helping businesses make informed decisions based on their specific needs for managing their wireless network management system and enterprise infrastructure performance.

For more on network monitoring

If you have questions or need help in finding vendors, feel free to reach out:

Find the Right Vendors

Transparency Statement: AIMultiple works with B2B tech vendors, including AKIPS. Vendors with links are among AIMultiple’s sponsors.

Access Cem's 2 decades of B2B tech experience as a tech consultant, enterprise leader, startup entrepreneur & industry analyst. Leverage insights informing top Fortune 500 every month.
Cem Dilmegani
Principal Analyst
Follow on
Cem Dilmegani
Principal Analyst

Cem is the principal analyst at AIMultiple since 2017. AIMultiple informs hundreds of thousands of businesses (as per Similarweb) including 60% of Fortune 500 every month.

Cem's work has been cited by leading global publications including Business Insider, Forbes, Washington Post, global firms like Deloitte, HPE, NGOs like World Economic Forum and supranational organizations like European Commission. You can see more reputable companies and media that referenced AIMultiple.

Throughout his career, Cem served as a tech consultant, tech buyer and tech entrepreneur. He advised enterprises on their technology decisions at McKinsey & Company and Altman Solon for more than a decade. He also published a McKinsey report on digitalization.

He led technology strategy and procurement of a telco while reporting to the CEO. He has also led commercial growth of deep tech company Hypatos that reached a 7 digit annual recurring revenue and a 9 digit valuation from 0 within 2 years. Cem's work in Hypatos was covered by leading technology publications like TechCrunch and Business Insider.

Cem regularly speaks at international technology conferences. He graduated from Bogazici University as a computer engineer and holds an MBA from Columbia Business School.

Sources:

AIMultiple.com Traffic Analytics, Ranking & Audience, Similarweb.
Why Microsoft, IBM, and Google Are Ramping up Efforts on AI Ethics, Business Insider.
Microsoft invests $1 billion in OpenAI to pursue artificial intelligence that’s smarter than we are, Washington Post.
Data management barriers to AI success, Deloitte.
Empowering AI Leadership: AI C-Suite Toolkit, World Economic Forum.
Science, Research and Innovation Performance of the EU, European Commission.
Public-sector digitization: The trillion-dollar challenge, McKinsey & Company.
Hypatos gets $11.8M for a deep learning approach to document processing, TechCrunch.
We got an exclusive look at the pitch deck AI startup Hypatos used to raise $11 million, Business Insider.

To stay up-to-date on B2B tech & accelerate your enterprise:

Follow on

Next to Read

Comments

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

0 Comments