Best US Proxies in 2026: American Proxy Servers Tested & Ranked
Finding a reliable US residential proxy is critical for navigating high-traffic sites like Amazon, eBay, and Walmart. We tested and ranked the top US proxy services across 100+ unique URLs every 15 minutes to measure real-world success rates and speed.
Based on our benchmark, here is which provider to choose for your specific objective:
2026 US proxy performance benchmarks
Top 6 proxies for the US: American IPs for social media automation
Where to buy the best US proxies: Top 6 American proxy sites
Bright Data delivered the fastest response times in our test, consistently between 1.2 and 1.6 seconds. Its success rate was stable, typically above 85%. The US infrastructure processes requests with minimal delay. The steady speed chart suggests a well-optimized network, likely supported by low-latency hubs such as Ashburn, Virginia (V.A proxies).
If you track real-time stock prices, monitor limited-inventory e-commerce items, or scrape flight prices, this low latency lets you access data before it changes.
Oxylabs achieved the highest overall success rate in the first half of the test, often reaching 90-92%. Its speed averaged 1.4 to 1.8 seconds, a bit slower than Bright Data, but with minimal volatility.
Oxylabs prioritizes stability over speed. Its system effectively bypasses anti-bot blocks, resulting in fewer 403 Forbidden errors and fewer CAPTCHA requests. This makes Oxylabs well-suited for continuous tasks such as SEO ranking tracking or scraping Google search results, where avoiding blocks matters more than a slight delay in page loading.
Decodo usually performs well, but our benchmarks did show a brief period of high volatility. During that time, success rates fell to about 72% and response times increased to almost 3 seconds. The system recovered quickly, and all metrics were back to normal within 48 hours.
These fluctuations are typically due to heavy network traffic or temporary blocks of specific US subnets by major target sites. Decodo’s automated systems address this by identifying underperforming nodes and replacing them with high-reputation IPs.
By promptly replacing burnt IPs, Decodo remains a reliable choice for managing multiple US-based accounts on platforms such as X (Twitter). Regularly updating the IP pool helps users maintain account health and avoid shadowbans from flagged subnets.
Webshare delivers average performance. In tests, its success rate ranged from 80% to 85%, and response times ranged from 1.8 to 2.4 seconds. It avoided the major crashes seen with ThorData, but was not as fast as Bright Data. Overall, it is a steady, standard network.
If you need to scrape many basic, low-security websites and want to keep costs down, Webshare offers a dependable option without paying for top speeds.
Thordata provides shared residential and mobile proxies, as well as dedicated ISP and datacenter proxies in the US. Thordata’s performance was inconsistent, with daily success rates ranging from 79% to 90%. It was also slower than other providers, typically requiring 2.2 to 2.6 seconds per request.
The daily fluctuations in performance indicate that Thordata likely relies on a smaller pool of US IPs shared among many users, which may cause network slowdowns or temporary IP bans.
Since Thordata appears to use different data centers than larger providers, it is best suited as a backup proxy. If your primary provider is blocked, you can switch to Thordata to maintain project continuity.
Apify recorded the slowest response times in the group, typically 2.0-2.6 seconds. Its average success rates were also lower during periods of heightened market security. Apify primarily serves as a platform for developing complex web scrapers rather than as a basic proxy service.
The slower speeds are due to additional technical processes required to load JavaScript and to securely manage browser fingerprints.
If your project requires scraping websites that involve clicking buttons or scrolling to load additional data, such as social media feeds, Apify is well-suited to the task. Fast proxies alone are insufficient if the page code does not execute properly.
V.A proxies: Latency advantage of the Virginia (Ashburn)
Ashburn, Virginia, serves as a primary global interconnection point, housing a vast majority of the world’s cloud computing power (including major AWS and Google Cloud clusters).
Virginia-based proxies reduce the distance between the proxy server and the target website’s host, improving response times. Benchmark results show that providers employing direct routing through Virginia, such as Bright Data, achieve response times that are 0.4 to 0.6 seconds faster compared to those routed through other U.S. regions. In high-frequency data collection scenarios, geographic proximity is the primary factor in minimizing latency.
US proxy types: Residential, datacenter & mobile IPs
1. US residential proxies
Residential proxies receive the highest trust scores from anti-bot systems because they appear identical to real home users. Our benchmarks show that residential pools from providers such as Oxylabs achieve the best success rates on high-security targets.
2. US datacenter proxies
Datacenter proxies are hosted on servers in professional facilities, such as those in the Ashburn, Virginia corridor, and are not linked to home ISPs. They work well for bulk web scraping from non-protected sites or as an entry-level choice for high-volume tasks.
3. US ISP proxies
ISP proxies combine the high-speed bandwidth of a data center with the reputation of a residential IP. They provide stable, non-rotating IPs, making them suitable for managing US-based social media or e-commerce accounts that require consistent login identities.
4. US mobile proxies
US mobile proxies use CGNAT (Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation), so thousands of real users share the same IP address. Mobile proxies are the most expensive option.
Residential US proxies methodology
We evaluated the performance of leading US residential proxy providers to provide data on reliability and speed for data extraction tasks within the United States market. The following testing framework was applied:
1. Target domains & scope
We tested the proxies against a diverse set of high-traffic US platforms with varying levels of bot-detection complexity:
- E-commerce: amazon.com, ebay.com, walmart.com
- Classifieds: craigslist.org
- Search Engines: duckduckgo.com
To simulate deep data scraping rather than simple homepage pings, we used a pool of over 100 unique URLs per domain, including product pages, search results, and category listings.
2. Testing frequency
Requests were sent at a consistent 15-minute interval to monitor how providers handle sustained traffic and varying network loads throughout the day.
3. Proxy configuration
- Type: Only residential proxies were used for this benchmark.
- Location: All requests were strictly geo-targeted to the United States to measure local latency and the ability to bypass region-specific blocks or localized content delivery networks (CDNs).
FAQs about US proxies
Be the first to comment
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.