Instead of showing a list of links, search engine tools like ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity now provide direct answers. This shift makes it harder for websites to stand out using only traditional SEO methods.
That’s where answer engine optimization tools come in. We examine the website of 13 and gain hands-on experience with 7 AEO/GEO tools.
Answer/generative engine optimization tools
Product | Automated query
generation | Sentiment analysis | Mention URLs | Free trial |
|---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | |
Otterly AI | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
ZipTie | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Cognizo | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
Peec | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
GetCito (AI Monitor) | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Profound | N/A | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
Scrunchai | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Athenahq | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
AirOps | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
For further information, read the key features.
RankPrompt
RankPrompt focuses on AI visibility through prompt-based research. Instead of keywords, it explores how AI engines respond to different queries related to your brand, product, or topic.
Summary of our experience:
When testing RankPrompt, we found that the platform initially generates around 100 prompts across three broad categories. These categories felt quite general at first, but the resulting prompts were surprisingly well-fitted to the domain context.
Strength(s)
✅ Provides domain-based prompt generation in broad but relevant topic areas.
✅ Offers well-matched prompts that reflect brand or content context.
✅ Designed specifically for AEO-style visibility tracking through prompt evaluation.
Limitation(s)
❌ Visibility results and detailed analytics are locked behind paid credits.
❌ Limited to prompt-based tracking, no keyword or traffic visibility metrics.
Good for: Early-stage AEO testing through prompt-level visibility checks.
Otterly AI
Otterly focuses on AI-based keyword visibility. Instead of relying only on traditional search engine optimization (SEO) tools, it scans your website to suggest keywords and search prompts that AI engines might pick up.
Summary of our experience:
We’ve tested Otterly AI for keyword exploration and found that it often proposes user queries with zero-click searches, which limits usability. While it scans the domain to generate keywords and prompts, its reliance on Google search volume makes it less effective..
Strength(s)
✅ Scans your domain content and name to suggest custom keywords.
✅ After conducting keyword research based on the domain content, the platform also offers search prompt ideas related to these SEO keywords.
✅ Helps you understand how your brand appears across AI-generated content.
✅ Offers weekly updates on your visibility.
Limitation(s)
❌ A key limitation is that the prompt suggestions often target keywords with no existing organic search traffic. This may reduce their value for driving visibility.
❌ No tracking of exact URLs where you’re mentioned.
❌ No sentiment analysis.
Good for: Early keyword exploration in AI-driven search engine results pages.
ZipTie
ZipTie is known for broad geographic tracking. It monitors how your brand appears in AI responses across 10+ countries.
Summary of our experience:
In our experience, ZipTie’s keyword suggestions feel loosely connected to the name of the actual domain and tend to be of poor quality. Although it allows for update frequency settings and language selection, the overall performance and insight depth left us disappointed.
Strength(s)
✅ Tracks mentions on search engines such as ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and others.
✅ Shows competitor appearances in the same results.
✅ Offers a prompt success score, helping you focus on prompts that work best.
✅ Supports country and language-specific user queries.
Limitation(s)
❌ Prompts aren’t always well-aligned with your domain’s content.
❌ Data refresh speed depends on pricing tier.
Good for: Seeing where and how your brand appears globally.
Cognizo
Cognizo offers in-depth analytics for those who already know the questions they want to track.
Summary of our experience:
We appreciated Cognizo’s detailed analytics, especially the ability to see how often our keywords appear in specific questions and how we compare to competitors.
Strength(s)
✅ Focuses on large language model platforms.
✅ Tracks brand mentions by specific question, keyword, or topic.
✅ Highlights competitors on a per-question basis.
✅ Let’s agencies create reports for multiple clients.
Limitation(s)
❌ Analysis might take time.
Good for: Agencies or advanced target audience who want question-specific online visibility metrics.
Peec
Peec monitors how often your brand is mentioned in AI-generated relevant answers. It also shows which platforms (like YouTube or Twitter) drive the most influence.
Strength(s)
✅ Tracks how often and where the brand is mentioned.
✅ Breaks down the sources AI tools rely on (e.g., Twitter vs. Wikipedia).
✅ Sends alerts when brands’ visibility changes.
✅ Shows actual result pages that mention the given domain.
✅ Updates ranking daily.
Limitation(s)
❌ Does not offer directions explicitly.
Good for: Teams that want a fast, straightforward view into how their brand performs in AI search.
GetCito (AI Monitor)
GetCito, previously known as AI Monitor, works more like a consulting service. It’s less about dashboards and more about insight-packed reports.
Summary of our experience:
When we tried AI Monitor, their focus seemed to be on selling insight-driven reports, and the prompts were clearly generated based more on the domain name than the actual content.
Strength(s)
✅ Offers brand benchmarking and platform comparisons.
✅ Monitors how AI crawlers interact with the content.
✅ Identifies technical issues like blocked crawlers or indexing problems.
✅ Focused on organic traffic and conversion insights from AI sources.
Limitation(s)
❌ No self-service interface or prompt generation.
❌ Brand visibility is not always presented in real time.
❌ Appears to use brand name more than site content for prompt suggestions.
Good for: Companies needing in-depth consulting or audits rather than hands-on daily tracking.
Profound
Profound helps brands understand tone and content of AI answers, not just visibility.
Strength(s)
✅ Assigns a visibility score and tracks share of voice for AI search results.
✅ Shows tone, keywords, and phrases AI-generated responses use to describe given brand.
✅ Maps which sources AIs rely on for information.
✅ Allows prompt testing using both custom and real-world search queries.
Limitation(s)
❌ Does not generate automated prompts.
Good for: Teams that care about brand narrative and tone in AI-generated answers.
Scrunchai
ScrunchAI is one of the most feature-complete tools, built for in-depth monitoring and optimization.
Strength(s)
✅ Simulates different user intents to see how AI answers change.
✅ Tracks citations and source credibility.
✅ Identifies misinformation, outdated content, and content gaps.
✅ Runs technical diagnostics, like checking if the given pages are even visible to AI crawlers.
✅ Links mentions to actual site visits.
Limitation(s)
❌ No automated prompt generation based on domain content.
Good for: Detailed AEO workflows that need both technical insights and content accuracy checks.
Athenahq
Athenahq helps brands monitor how they appear in AI-generated content.
Strength(s)
✅ Pinpoints content gaps by showing when AI tools miss key facts about your business.
✅ Offers a built-in Action Center provides some “next steps”, based on the insights from analysis.
Limitation(s)
❌ From our experience, we can see that automated prompt generation also appears to be influenced by the website’s name, not just its content. This can result in prompts with keywords that are weakly related to the actual brand.
❌ Relies only on ChatGPT
Good for: Teams need actionable plans based on answer engine optimization data.
AirOps
AirOps is a generative answer optimization (AEO) and SEO analysis tool. Instead of only showing AI search visibility, AirOps analyzes how existing pages perform across key quality signals that matter for AI systems. These include freshness, structure, authority, brand alignment, and the ease with which AI can extract short answers.
Summary of our experience:
When we tested AirOps, it generated prompts based on the selected domain and provided detailed page-level SEO and AEO analysis. One notable feature was its visibility into off-site signals, such as Reddit citation rates and specific Reddit comment URLs where the domain was mentioned. The tool also produced clear, structured recommendations for improving a selected page.
Strength(s)
✅ Provides domain-level and sample URL-level insights.
✅ Shows external signals, such as Reddit mentions and citation patterns.
✅ Combines SEO and AEO analysis in a single audit.
Limitation(s)
❌ Less focused on real-time prompt testing compared to prompt-only tools.
❌ More analytical than exploratory, which may feel heavy for quick checks.
Good for: Teams that want a clear, structured view of content quality and how well their pages are prepared for AI answer engines, beyond basic prompt or keyword tracking.
Ahrefs
Ahrefs is mainly known as an SEO platform. Its AI monitoring tool, Brand Radar, adds features that let users track how AI systems present their brand in chatbot results like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google’s AI Overviews.
Summary of our experience:
We tested Ahrefs Brand Radar by entering our brand name, keywords, and competitors manually. The platform does not automatically scan the site or generate queries. The resulting insights were limited in depth and felt more like repackaged SEO data than genuine AI search tracking. Sentiment detection was available but often vague.
Strength(s)
✅ Uses AI to expand keyword lists and group them by difficulty, intent, and CPC.
✅ Tracks keyword trends and search volumes over time.
✅ Helps with identifying long-tail keywords and ad planning.
Limitation(s)
❌ User must input all keywords and competitor info manually.
❌ Results can feel less actionable for AI-focused use cases.
Good for: Users who want a basic layer of artificial intelligence search visibility monitoring.
Semrush
Semrush offers AI-enhanced keyword research tools. It focuses on discovering keyword opportunities, search trends, and intent for both paid and organic search strategies. Compared to others, it still operates mostly within the traditional SEO space. However, Keyword Magic Tool offers some AEO features as well.
Strength(s)
✅ Analyzes keyword difficulty, trend, CPC, and intent.
✅ Helps identify low-competition long-tail keywords.
Limitation(s)
❌ Doesn’t show exact URLs or pages where your brand appears.
❌ Does not track how AI systems like ChatGPT mention or cite your site.
Good for: SEO teams who want keyword strategies that may support future AI search visibility but don’t need detailed monitoring of AI-generated content.
DemandSphere
DemandSphere measures visibility primarily through keyword tracking rather than prompts. The tool operates much like an SEO analytics platform but integrates AI search behavior, focusing on how target keywords perform across both Google and AI-enhanced results.
Summary of our experience:
We found that DemandSphere relies on user-defined keyword lists rather than automatically generating them. Once keywords are added, the platform provides related “People also ask” questions and visibility insights tied to Google Search Console data. It’s effective for keyword-based visibility but feels closer to traditional SEO tracking than full AEO monitoring.
Strength(s)
✅ Let users define and track their own keywords.
✅ Surfaces “People also ask” questions for contextual keyword expansion.
✅ Integrates well with Google Search Console data for performance analysis.
Limitation(s)
❌ Does not track prompt-based visibility or AI-generated query responses.
❌ Heavily SEO-oriented, offering limited insight into LLM-based or AI engine visibility.
Good for: Teams that want to extend their SEO tracking toward AI search behavior without switching fully to prompt-based AEO tools.
Key features of answer engine optimization tools
Automated query generation
Most AEO tools aim to automatically create search queries by scanning a domain or using its name. However, we’ve found that these queries sometimes lack relevance or don’t reflect actual user search behavior. This reduces their value for conducting keyword research or optimizing for user intent.
Sentiment analysis
A few tools attempt to show user sentiment linked to mentions of a brand or topic. While potentially helpful for digital marketing or enhancing user experience, this feature is often underdeveloped and lacks depth.
Learn more on sentiment analysis with AI-based tools, read
- Sentiment Analysis Benchmark Testing: ChatGPT, Claude & DeepSeek
- Examples of ChatGPT Sentiment Analysis
Mention URLs
We’ve seen tools that identify where and how a brand or keyword is mentioned, often linking to specific URLs. This can help analyze referral traffic, audit backlink quality, and understand where AI-generated answers may be pulling from.
Why these features matter
- Optimizing for answer engines means creating precise answers that align with user queries and AI-generated responses.
- Using structured data markup like FAQ pages and schema markup helps AI engines extract relevant answers.
- Understanding user behavior and intent allows for better content structuring, internal linking, and targeting for voice search and AI assistants.
- By integrating these insights, marketing teams can go beyond traditional SEO strategies and improve online visibility in natural language-driven search environments.
AEO vs SEO strategies
Traditional Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and Answer/Generative Engine Optimization (AEO/GEO) focus on different goals. Here’s how to succeed in each:
1. Which approach to attract users
AEO/GEO:
- Use full questions people actually ask
- Write in a clear, natural, conversational tone
- Focus on being helpful and easy to understand
SEO:
- Use keywords in titles and headers
- Add related terms to improve ranking
- Focus on keyword density and variations
Example:
SEO: “Answer Engine Optimization (AEO): Definition & Tips”
GEO: “What is Answer Engine Optimization (AEO)?”
2. How to write answers
AEO/GEO:
- Provide early direct and concise answers
- Focus on depth, not length – one precise answer beats ten weak ones
- Use bullets, summaries, and direct answers near the top
SEO:
- Spread answers across the article to increase time on page
- Use long-form articles with multiple keywords
- Place key points in subheadings and meta descriptions
3. What to include
AEO/GEO:
- Mixed content: text, images, short videos, audio
- Focus on being helpful and multi-format
- Optimized for AI systems and human understanding
SEO:
- Blog posts, guides, landing pages
- Focus on getting backlinks
- Optimized for bots and humans
How to combine SEO and AEO for better search results
SEO and AEO/GEO don’t need to compete. They work better together. Websites using also AEO strategies gain about 23% more search visibility than those using only traditional SEO. This shows that AEO can help more people find your content.1 Instead of choosing one, you can use both together. Here’s how:
1. Create content for both search and answers
SEO likes long articles with keywords and detailed info.
AEO likes short answers, FAQs, and simple summaries.
Do this:
- Write full blog posts (SEO).
- Add short questions and answers in each post (AEO).
- Use bullet points and clear headings.
2. Use structured data (Schema Markup)
Search engines and AI tools need help understanding your content.
Structured data tells them what your page is about.
Do this:
- Use FAQ, How-To, and Product schema.
- Mark up key info: opening hours, prices, reviews.
- This helps you show up in featured snippets and voice search results.
3. Combine two keyword optimization
SEO uses short keywords like “top social listening platforms”
AEO uses longer, natural questions like “What are the top social listening platforms?”
Do this:
- Mix both in your content.
- Think how people type (SEO) and how they speak (AEO).
4. Make your site easy to use
A fast, mobile-friendly site helps with both SEO and AEO.
Do this:
- Use clear headings and short paragraphs.
- Make sure pages load quickly.
- Test your site on mobile devices.
5. Write like a human
People using voice search ask questions the way they speak.
Do this:
- Use a friendly, natural tone.
- Write like you’re answering a real person.
Be the first to comment
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.