We evaluated top mobile proxy providers using 18,000 requests, analyzing their success rates, speeds, rotation capabilities, sticky sessions, targeting options (country, state, carrier, and GPS), and support. Explanations for each choice are provided through the links.
All vendors listed below were benchmarked under identical conditions, including the same test URLs, rotation intervals, and network types (4G and 5G). Here’s a quick comparison of the top-rated mobile proxy providers we tested.
Benchmarking the best mobile proxy services
Compare leading mobile proxy providers on real mobile endpoints. The chart shows success rate (share of requests that returned a valid mobile page, 2xx/3xx, correct mobile DOM, no captcha/block) and average response time (mean total time for successful requests).
Results are updated continuously from benchmark runs executed every 15 minutes across randomized mobile URLs:
For full details on how we test, see our methodology section.
Mobile proxies pricing benchmark
You can view a detailed price change graph for various mobile proxy providers in the following graph. For detailed information, see our benchmark’s pricing approach.
The best mobile proxy services of 2025
Bright Data provides access to over 7 million mobile IPs worldwide and supports both HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 protocols. It’s one of the most established mobile proxy networks, offering advanced targeting at the country-, city-, ASN-, and ZIP-level.
The service includes two main types of mobile proxy plans:
- Shared (Pay-per-GB): ideal for flexible or smaller-scale use cases.
- Dedicated (Pay-per-IP): suitable for automation, large-scale scraping, or account management.
Both subscription and pay-as-you-go options are available, with no extra fees for specific carriers or cities, making Bright Data a strong choice for teams that need scalable, location-accurate proxies.
Pros:
- Based on our benchmark, Bright Data maintained a success rate between 90–95%, placing it in the top tier for reliability.
- Targeting by country, city, ZIP, carrier, ASN
- No additional cost for choosing specific carriers/cities
- Reliable 1.5–2 ms average response time
Cons:
- Learning curve for beginners (complex dashboard)
- No unlimited traffic option on lower-tier plans
Bright Data offers a first deposit match up to $500 for mobile proxies.
Visit WebsiteDecodo provides access to over 10 million mobile IPs, enabling country, city, ASN, and OS-level targeting, allowing you to filter traffic by iOS or Android devices.
Each plan includes a browser extension, built-in proxy checker, and access to Decodo’s X Browser, which helps manage sessions and reduce fingerprinting risks.
Pros:
- Top-tier success rate (95–98%) and fast response times
- Easy-to-use browser tools (X Browser + Proxy Checker)
Cons:
- Limited rotation customization for shared proxies
Oxylabs’ mobile proxies support granular targeting across countries, states, cities, ASNs, and even GPS coordinates for precise location testing. By default, IPs rotate with every request, and users can customize the rotation intervals up to 30 minutes, making it ideal for both high-frequency scraping and longer session-based workflows.
The network is designed for scalability, supporting millions of carrier-grade IP addresses with automatic rotation. Note that only HTTP connections are available when using Oxylabs’ mobile proxies on Android devices over mobile networks.
Pros:
- Success rate (92–96%) and stable response times
- Very granular GPS-level targeting for local testing
Cons:
- Pricing is on the higher side for small teams
- HTTP-only support on Android devices
ProxyScrape’s mobile proxies support the HTTP protocol and provide country-level targeting for the US, UK, and Austria. Users can also narrow traffic to specific US states such as New York, Florida, and Texas, making it a flexible choice for region-specific testing.
By default, ProxyScrape offers rotating mobile proxies, with the option to enable sticky sessions for up to 3 minutes. This balance between rotation and session persistence makes it suitable for lightweight automation, ad verification, and general browsing use cases.
Pros:
- Competitive pricing and flexible plans
- Easy setup and quick IP rotation
Cons:
- Limited targeting outside of the US, UK, and Austria
- No built-in OS or carrier filtering
NodeMaven allows users to target mobile proxies at the region, city, and ISP levels. Its pool rotates by default, but users can enable sticky sessions lasting up to 24 hours, one of the longest session durations among mid-tier providers.
While NodeMaven doesn’t yet support OS-specific filtering (such as iOS vs. Android), its pool includes IPs from both platforms, which are refreshed frequently to minimize bans. NodeMaven averaged a success rate of 72–76%, ranking below enterprise competitors but offering decent consistency for a budget-friendly service.
Pros:
- 24-hour sticky sessions available
- Shared pool with cross-platform IPs (Android + iOS)
Cons:
- Smaller IP pool than premium competitors
- Lower success rate (≈ 72–76 %) in tests
DataImpulse’s mobile proxies provide targeting at the country, state, city, ASN, and ZIP code levels. They offer both rotating and sticky sessions for flexible usage. Additionally, the provider provides a paid trial option, allowing users to test the service with 5GB of data for $5.
NetNut sells 5 million rotating mobile proxies across more than 100 countries. It supports both HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 protocols, offering city- and state-level targeting for advanced geolocation use cases. Some finer-grained filters (like carrier or ASN) are available under premium tiers for an added fee.
Pros:
- HTTP(S) + SOCKS5 support
- City/state-level targeting (paid upgrade)
Cons:
- No OS filtering
- Extra fees for granular targeting
Infatica specializes in dedicated mobile proxies with country-, city-, and ASN-level targeting. Designed for session-based tasks such as social media management or QA testing, its sticky sessions can last up to 60 minutes, striking a balance between persistence and flexibility of rotation.
Pros:
- Long sticky sessions (up to 1 hour)
- Targeting by country, city, ASN
Cons:
- Smaller IP pool than larger competitors
- Fewer targeting options (no carrier/OS)
Mobile proxy benchmark methodology
Scope & targets: Test real carrier mobile proxies against mobile endpoints only (m.google.com/m.bing.com/m.yahoo.com/yandex touch; m.amazon/eBay/Walmart mobile product pages; m.instagram.com/m.twitter.com). Randomize one mobile URL per category each 15-minute cycle; run all vendors concurrently.
Traffic profile: Send only mobile UAs (Android Chrome, iOS Safari) with realistic client hints (Sec-CH-UA-*, Viewport-Width, DPR, Accept-Language, optional Save-Data). Use HTTP/2, 10s connect / 20s total timeouts. Record TLS/JA3 hash if available.
FAQs about mobile proxies
Be the first to comment
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.