We analyzed 15+ LLMs and their pricing and performance. LLM API pricing can be complex and depends on your preferred usage. If you plan to use:
- The chat user interface, see all major LLM subscription plans
- APIs, see LLMs ranked by their performance and type your volume needs in terms of tokens to see the exact pricing:
Model | Input Price | Output Price | Context Length | Max Output Tokens | Arena Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Google Gemini-2.5-Pro | $2.50 | $15.00 | 1,000k | 65k | 1,446 |
OpenAI o3 | $10.00 | $40.00 | 200k | 100k | 1,409 |
OpenAI gpt-4o | $2.50 | $10.00 | 128k | 16k | 1,405 |
xAI Grok-3-Preview | $3.00 | $15.00 | 131k | n/a | 1,399 |
OpenAI gpt-4.5 | $75.00 | $150.00 | 128k | 16k | 1,394 |
DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3 | $0.27 | $1.10 | 64k | 8k | 1,368 |
DeepSeek DeepSeek-R1 | $0.55 | $2.19 | 64k | 8k | 1,354 |
Google Gemini-2.0-Flash-001 | $0.10 | $0.40 | 1,000k | 8k | 1,351 |
OpenAI o1-2024-12-17 | $15.00 | $60.00 | 200k | 100k | 1,346 |
Google Gemma-3-27B-it | n/a | n/a | 128k | 8k | 1,339 |
Hover over model names to see their full names and over headers to see explanations about the columns.
Ranking: The ranking of models is based on the Overall Arena Score in the Chatbot Arena LLM leaderboard.1
When the official Grok 3 API is released and Gemini’s experimental models exit their experimental phase, the missing values will be populated with the official values.
Rate limits control Google API request frequency for free tiers.2
You can check the hallucination rates and reasoning performance of top LLMs in our benchmarks.
Understanding LLM Pricing
Tokens: The Fundamental Unit of Pricing

While providers offer a variety of pricing structures, per-token pricing is the most common. Tokenization methods differ across models; examples include:
- Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE): Splits words into frequent subword units, balancing vocabulary size and efficiency.4
- Example: “unbelievable” → [“un”, “believ”, “able”]
- WordPiece: Similar to BPE but optimizes for language model likelihood, used in BERT.5
- Example: “tokenization” → [“token”, “##ization”]. “token” is a standalone word; “##ization” is a suffix.
- SentencePiece: Tokenizes text without relying on spaces, effective for multilingual models like T5.6
- Example: “natural language” → [” natural”, ” lan”, “guage”] or [” natu”, “ral”, ” language”].
Please note that the exact subwords depend on the training data and BPE/WordPiece process. To better understand these tokenization methods, watch the video below:
After grasping tokenization, an average price can be estimated based on project token length. Table 2 outlines token ranges by content type, such as UI prompts, email snippets, marketing blogs, detailed reports, and research papers, while noting that token counts vary across models. Once a model is chosen, its tokenizer can be used to have an idea of the average token count for the content.
Content Type | Word Count Range (words) | Token Count Range (tokens) | Typical Enterprise Use Cases |
---|---|---|---|
Sentence | 10–20 | 15–35 | UI prompts, notifications, chatbot responses |
Paragraph | 75–150 | 100–225 | Email snippets, product descriptions, help texts |
Short Article | 400–600 | 520–900 | Marketing blogs, press releases, case studies |
Long Article | 900–1,100 | 1,200–1,650 | Detailed reports, whitepapers, internal knowledge bases |
Research Paper | 4,500–5,500 | 5,850–8,250 | Academic publications, R&D documents, technical whitepapers |
Table 2. Typical content types, their size ranges, and enterprise considerations (ranges are estimates and may vary).
Context Window Implications
Awareness of the context window concept is another crucial factor to consider regarding pricing. Here, it is essential to ensure that the total number of tokens from both the input and output does not exceed the context window/length.
If the total exceeds the context window, it may lead to the truncation of the excess output, as shown in Figure 2. Therefore, the output may not be as expected. It is important to note that tokens generated during the reasoning process are also counted within this limitation.

Max Output Tokens
This is an important parameter in Large Language Models (LLMs) to achieve the desired output and manage costs effectively. While many documentations mention that it can be adjusted using the max_tokens parameter, it is crucial to review the documentation of the specific API being used to identify the correct parameter. It should be adjusted according to the specific needs:
If set too low: It may result in incomplete outputs, causing the model to cut off responses before delivering the full answer.
If set too high: Depending on the temperature (a parameter that controls response creativity) setting, it can lead to unnecessarily verbose outputs, longer response times, and increased cost.
Therefore, it is a parameter that requires careful consideration to optimize resource usage while balancing output quality, cost, and performance.
Content Type | Input Prompt Example | Input Token Count* | Assumed Output Token Count* |
---|---|---|---|
Sentence | “Generate a friendly notification message reminding users to complete their profile within the app.” | 15 | 25 |
Paragraph | “Write a concise email snippet announcing the launch of our new product feature, highlighting its key benefit.” | 19 | 162 |
Short Article | “Create a short blog post explaining how our new software solution improves remote team productivity.” | 18 | 710 |
Long Article | “Draft a comprehensive whitepaper outlining the impact of AI on the future of supply chain management, including real-world case studies.” | 24 | 1,425 |
Research Paper | “Write a comprehensive full-length research paper on the application of machine learning algorithms in geological data analysis, covering background, literature review, theoretical framework, methodology, results, discussion, and referencing recent studies.” | 26 | 7,050 |
Table 3. Example input prompts and estimated token counts per content type.
*This assumes that each model produces responses with an equal number of output tokens, although the token count for both input and output may vary depending on each model’s tokenization, the number has been kept constant here for each model.
The LLM API price calculator can be used to determine the total cost per model when generating the content types from Table 2 via the API using the sample prompts provided in Table 3, as well as for calculating costs for custom cases beyond the suggested content types.
LLM API Price Calculator
You can calculate your total cost by filling out these 3 values below and sort the results by input cost, output cost, total cost, or alphabetically in increasing or decreasing order:
The default ranking is based on the total cost.
Comparing LLM Subscription Plans
Non-technical users may prefer to use the UI rather than the API, here is the UI pricing:
Plan | Price | Key Features | Limitations |
---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Copilot/Free | $0 | Basic Microsoft app integration Multiple devices and platforms 15 boosts per day | Limited credits for AI usage (includes designer only) Preferred model access only during non-peak times Limited Copilot Voice usage |
Microsoft Copilot/Pro | $20/month | Preferred model access 100 boosts per day Full Microsoft 365 integration Early feature access All Microsoft app support | Individual use only |
Google Gemini/Basic | $0 | 2.0 Flash model access Basic writing & images Google apps integration Voice conversations | Basic model only, Limited features |
Google Gemini/Advanced | $19.99/month | 2.0 Pro experimental model Deep research capability 1500-page document analysis 2TB storage Custom AI experts (Gems) Code smarter | |
Mistral AI/Free | $0 | Web browsing & news Basic file analysis Image generation Flash answers | Training data usage, Limited capabilities |
Mistral AI/Pro | $14.99/month | Unlimited web browsing Extended analysis Opt-out data sharing Dedicated support | Individual use only |
Mistral AI/Team | $19.99 per user / month billed annualy $24.99 per user / month billed monthly | Central billing API credits Data excluded from training Advanced features | Minimum 2 members |
Mistral AI/Enterprise | Custom | Secure deployment in your environment Enhanced support Granular admin controls Detailed analytics | |
OpenAI/Free | $0 | GPT-4o mini access Standard voice Limited uploads Basic images | Usage caps, Basic models only |
OpenAI/Plus | $20/month | Extended limits Advanced voice Beta features Limited GPT-4 | Individual use, Usage must follow policies |
Using Multiple Language Models
A tool like OpenRouter allows the same prompt to be sent simultaneously to multiple models. The responses, token consumption, response time, and pricing can then be compared to determine which model is most suitable for the task.

Benefits and Challenges
- Increased Adaptability and Efficiency: Orchestration enhances responsiveness, allowing for real-time assessment of model efficiency, leading to the identification of a cost-effective model and potential savings.
- Prompt Sensitivity and Optimization: Identical prompts can elicit vastly different outputs across models, necessitating prompt engineering tailored to each model to achieve desired results, adding to development and maintenance complexity.
FAQ
Reference Links

Cem's work has been cited by leading global publications including Business Insider, Forbes, Washington Post, global firms like Deloitte, HPE and NGOs like World Economic Forum and supranational organizations like European Commission. You can see more reputable companies and resources that referenced AIMultiple.
Throughout his career, Cem served as a tech consultant, tech buyer and tech entrepreneur. He advised enterprises on their technology decisions at McKinsey & Company and Altman Solon for more than a decade. He also published a McKinsey report on digitalization.
He led technology strategy and procurement of a telco while reporting to the CEO. He has also led commercial growth of deep tech company Hypatos that reached a 7 digit annual recurring revenue and a 9 digit valuation from 0 within 2 years. Cem's work in Hypatos was covered by leading technology publications like TechCrunch and Business Insider.
Cem regularly speaks at international technology conferences. He graduated from Bogazici University as a computer engineer and holds an MBA from Columbia Business School.

Comments 0
Share Your Thoughts
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.