AIMultipleAIMultiple
No results found.

LLM Pricing: Top 15+ Providers Compared in 2025

Cem Dilmegani
Cem Dilmegani
updated on Aug 4, 2025

We analyzed 15+ LLMs and their pricing and performance. LLM API pricing can be complex and depends on your preferred usage. If you plan to use:

Model
Input Price
Output Price
Context Length
Max Output Tokens
Arena Score
Google Gemini-2.5-Pro
$2.50
$15.00
1,000k
65k
1,446
OpenAI o3
$10.00
$40.00
200k
100k
1,409
OpenAI gpt-4o
$2.50
$10.00
128k
16k
1,405
xAI Grok-3-Preview
$3.00
$15.00
131k
n/a
1,399
OpenAI gpt-4.5
$75.00
$150.00
128k
16k
1,394
DeepSeek DeepSeek-V3
$0.27
$1.10
64k
8k
1,368
DeepSeek DeepSeek-R1
$0.55
$2.19
64k
8k
1,354
Google Gemini-2.0-Flash-001
$0.10
$0.40
1,000k
8k
1,351
OpenAI o1-2024-12-17
$15.00
$60.00
200k
100k
1,346
Google Gemma-3-27B-it
n/a
n/a
128k
8k
1,339

Hover over model names to see their full names and over headers to see explanations about the columns.

Ranking: The ranking of models is based on the Overall Arena Score in the Chatbot Arena LLM leaderboard.1

When the official Grok 3 API is released and Gemini’s experimental models exit their experimental phase, the missing values will be populated with the official values.

Rate limits control Google API request frequency for free tiers.2

You can check the hallucination rates and reasoning performance of top LLMs in our benchmarks.

Understanding LLM Pricing

Tokens: The Fundamental Unit of Pricing

While providers offer a variety of pricing structures, per-token pricing is the most common. Tokenization methods differ across models; examples include:

  • Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE): Splits words into frequent subword units, balancing vocabulary size and efficiency.4
    • Example: “unbelievable” → [“un”, “believ”, “able”]
  • WordPiece: Similar to BPE but optimizes for language model likelihood, used in BERT.5
    • Example: “tokenization” → [“token”, “##ization”]. “token” is a standalone word; “##ization” is a suffix.
  • SentencePiece: Tokenizes text without relying on spaces, effective for multilingual models like T5.6
    • Example: “natural language” → [” natural”, ” lan”, “guage”] or [” natu”, “ral”, ” language”].

Please note that the exact subwords depend on the training data and BPE/WordPiece process. To better understand these tokenization methods, watch the video below:

After grasping tokenization, an average price can be estimated based on project token length. Table 2 outlines token ranges by content type, such as UI prompts, email snippets, marketing blogs, detailed reports, and research papers, while noting that token counts vary across models. Once a model is chosen, its tokenizer can be used to have an idea of the average token count for the content.

Content Type
Word Count Range (words)
Token Count Range (tokens)
Typical Enterprise Use Cases
Sentence
10–20
15–35
UI prompts, notifications, chatbot responses
Paragraph
75–150
100–225
Email snippets, product descriptions, help texts
Short Article
400–600
520–900
Marketing blogs, press releases, case studies
Long Article
900–1,100
1,200–1,650
Detailed reports, whitepapers, internal knowledge bases
Research Paper
4,500–5,500 
5,850–8,250
Academic publications, R&D documents, technical whitepapers

Table 2. Typical content types, their size ranges, and enterprise considerations (ranges are estimates and may vary).

Context Window Implications

Awareness of the context window concept is another crucial factor to consider regarding pricing. Here, it is essential to ensure that the total number of tokens from both the input and output does not exceed the context window/length.

If the total exceeds the context window, it may lead to the truncation of the excess output, as shown in Figure 2. Therefore, the output may not be as expected. It is important to note that tokens generated during the reasoning process are also counted within this limitation.

Max Output Tokens

This is an important parameter in Large Language Models (LLMs) to achieve the desired output and manage costs effectively. While many documentations mention that it can be adjusted using the max_tokens parameter, it is crucial to review the documentation of the specific API being used to identify the correct parameter. It should be adjusted according to the specific needs:

If set too low: It may result in incomplete outputs, causing the model to cut off responses before delivering the full answer.

If set too high: Depending on the temperature (a parameter that controls response creativity) setting, it can lead to unnecessarily verbose outputs, longer response times, and increased cost.

Therefore, it is a parameter that requires careful consideration to optimize resource usage while balancing output quality, cost, and performance.

Content Type
Input Prompt Example
Input Token Count*
Assumed Output Token Count*
Sentence
“Generate a friendly notification message reminding users to complete their profile within the app.”
15
25
Paragraph
“Write a concise email snippet announcing the launch of our new product feature, highlighting its key benefit.”
19
162
Short Article
“Create a short blog post explaining how our new software solution improves remote team productivity.”
18
710
Long Article
“Draft a comprehensive whitepaper outlining the impact of AI on the future of supply chain management, including real-world case studies.”
24
1,425
Research Paper
“Write a comprehensive full-length research paper on the application of machine learning algorithms in geological data analysis, covering background, literature review, theoretical framework, methodology, results, discussion, and referencing recent studies.”
26
7,050

Table 3. Example input prompts and estimated token counts per content type.

*This assumes that each model produces responses with an equal number of output tokens, although the token count for both input and output may vary depending on each model’s tokenization, the number has been kept constant here for each model.

The LLM API price calculator can be used to determine the total cost per model when generating the content types from Table 2 via the API using the sample prompts provided in Table 3, as well as for calculating costs for custom cases beyond the suggested content types.

LLM API Price Calculator

You can calculate your total cost by filling out these 3 values below and sort the results by input cost, output cost, total cost, or alphabetically in increasing or decreasing order:

The default ranking is based on the total cost.

Comparing LLM Subscription Plans

Non-technical users may prefer to use the UI rather than the API, here is the UI pricing:

Plan
Price
Key Features
Limitations
Microsoft Copilot/Free
$0
Basic Microsoft app integration
Multiple devices and platforms
15 boosts per day
Limited credits for AI usage (includes designer only)
Preferred model access only during non-peak times
Limited Copilot Voice usage
Microsoft Copilot/Pro
$20/month
Preferred model access
100 boosts per day
Full Microsoft 365 integration
Early feature access
All Microsoft app support
Individual use only
Google Gemini/Basic
$0
2.0 Flash model access
Basic writing & images
Google apps integration
Voice conversations
Basic model only, Limited features
Google Gemini/Advanced
$19.99/month
2.0 Pro experimental model
Deep research capability
1500-page document analysis
2TB storage
Custom AI experts (Gems)
Code smarter
Mistral AI/Free
$0
Web browsing & news
Basic file analysis
Image generation
Flash answers
Training data usage, Limited capabilities
Mistral AI/Pro
$14.99/month
Unlimited web browsing
Extended analysis
Opt-out data sharing
Dedicated support
Individual use only
Mistral AI/Team
$19.99 per user / month billed annualy
$24.99 per user / month billed monthly
Central billing
API credits
Data excluded from training
Advanced features
Minimum 2 members
Mistral AI/Enterprise
Custom
Secure deployment in your environment
Enhanced support
Granular admin controls
Detailed analytics
OpenAI/Free
$0
GPT-4o mini access
Standard voice
Limited uploads
Basic images
Usage caps, Basic models only
OpenAI/Plus
$20/month
Extended limits
Advanced voice
Beta features
Limited GPT-4
Individual use, Usage must follow policies

Using Multiple Language Models

A tool like OpenRouter allows the same prompt to be sent simultaneously to multiple models. The responses, token consumption, response time, and pricing can then be compared to determine which model is most suitable for the task.

Benefits and Challenges

  • Increased Adaptability and Efficiency: Orchestration enhances responsiveness, allowing for real-time assessment of model efficiency, leading to the identification of a cost-effective model and potential savings.
  • Prompt Sensitivity and Optimization: Identical prompts can elicit vastly different outputs across models, necessitating prompt engineering tailored to each model to achieve desired results, adding to development and maintenance complexity.

FAQ

Principal Analyst
Cem Dilmegani
Cem Dilmegani
Principal Analyst
Cem has been the principal analyst at AIMultiple since 2017. AIMultiple informs hundreds of thousands of businesses (as per similarWeb) including 55% of Fortune 500 every month.

Cem's work has been cited by leading global publications including Business Insider, Forbes, Washington Post, global firms like Deloitte, HPE and NGOs like World Economic Forum and supranational organizations like European Commission. You can see more reputable companies and resources that referenced AIMultiple.

Throughout his career, Cem served as a tech consultant, tech buyer and tech entrepreneur. He advised enterprises on their technology decisions at McKinsey & Company and Altman Solon for more than a decade. He also published a McKinsey report on digitalization.

He led technology strategy and procurement of a telco while reporting to the CEO. He has also led commercial growth of deep tech company Hypatos that reached a 7 digit annual recurring revenue and a 9 digit valuation from 0 within 2 years. Cem's work in Hypatos was covered by leading technology publications like TechCrunch and Business Insider.

Cem regularly speaks at international technology conferences. He graduated from Bogazici University as a computer engineer and holds an MBA from Columbia Business School.
View Full Profile
Researched by
Alparslan Polat
Alparslan Polat
AI Researcher
Alparslan Polat is an AI Researcher at AIMultiple. His current work focuses on GPUs, synthetic data generation, computer vision, and large language models (LLMs).
View Full Profile

Comments 0

Share Your Thoughts

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.

0/450