Effectively managing user access should not pose a continual security risk, yet many IT teams face ongoing challenges. Issues such as weak passwords, the presence of abandoned accounts, and the complexity of managing multiple authentication methods across both cloud and on-premises systems often complicate security management.
To address these challenges, below we listed the top 8 identity and access management (IAM) solutions. We evaluated these solutions based on their scalability and integration capabilities across cloud and on-prem environments. We also considered administrative features like multi-tenancy and real-time password synchronization.
Best identity and access management solutions summary
All software support basic identity access management (IAM) features such as single sign-on (SSO), identity verification and self-service password reset/change, and account unlocking.
Adaptive authentication features
*If OneLogin is configured to execute single sign-on (SSO) for Azure AD you can still use conditional access for Microsoft 365/Azure authentication.
- Conditional access dynamically enforces authentication policies based on user context (e.g., device type, IP address, geolocation, or access time). Ensures adaptive risk-based security.
- Offline MFA (multi-factor authentication) enables offline logons.
Administrative features
- Multi-tenancy architecture manage multiple tenants (departments, or client accounts) within a single software instance. Best for enterprises or managed service providers (MSPs) who maintain distinct policies.
- A real-time password synchronizer ensures that password changes are immediately reflected across connected systems and applications.
ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus
ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus is a self-service password management and single sign-on (SSO) solution with risk-based multi-factor authentication (MFA) capabilities.
Its adaptive authentication flow and MFA capabilities, also known as risk-based MFA, provide users with authentication factors that change each time they log in. These factors include:
- The number of consecutive logon failures.
- The user who has requested access’s physical location (geolocation).
- The type of device.
- The day of the week and time of day.
- IP address.
For example, if a user attempts to log in to their work laptop during unusual hours, ADSelfService Plus can detect the anomaly through conditional access policies and increase the authentication requirements. The user can be prompted to verify their identity through additional multi-factor authentication (MFA).
Pricing: ADSelfService Plus is available in three editions: the free plan (for 50 users), the standard plan, and the professional plan. The Starter plan (for 100 users) costs between $245 and $5,920 and includes features such as a web-based self-service password reset and a password expiry notifier.
For more details check MFA pricing and, top 10 open-source MFA tools.
Why we like it:
- Extensive multi-factor authentication (MFA) options:
- ADSelfService Plus supports several MFA methods, including Microsoft Authenticator and YubiKey, for securing desktops, servers, remote desktop protocol (RDP) sessions, and enterprise applications.
- Offers online MFA (verifies via server communication) and offline MFA (uses stored authenticator data for local logins).
- Security against cyberattacks: ADSelfService Plus provides built-in protection against brute-force attacks using CAPTCHA and account lockout after failed authentication attempts.
What needs improvement:
- SMS verification vulnerabilities: The verification techniques offered by ADSelfService Plus have some vulnerabilities. For example, SMS-based verification is vulnerable to SIM swap attacks, where an attacker fraudulently gains control of a user’s mobile number. Once successful, the attacker can receive SMS-based OTPs.
- Feature gaps in scalability: While the ADSelfService Plus performs well for smaller environments, some features, such as custom SAML configurations require heavy customization in large-scale implementations.
Cisco Duo
When Duo detects a high-risk authentication attempt from a user for an application, it restricts the available authentication methods to those that best mitigate the risk. The user will only be able to authenticate by choosing one of these secure methods to validate their identity.
Authentication factors accepted in higher-risk authentications:
- Verified Duo Push – A six-digit code that the user needs to enter from the authentication prompt on their mobile device.
- Platform authenticators – WebAuthn FIDO2 security keys that require biometric or PIN verification, or biometric sensors such as Touch ID.
- Bypass codes – provided to users by a Duo administrator.
- YubiKey passcodes
These authentication methods such as Duo Push without a verification code, Duo Mobile passcodes, SMS passcodes, and phone callbacks will be restricted for use in a higher-risk scenario.
Why we like it:
- Risk detection: Cisco Duo uses a combination of IP history, Wi-Fi fingerprints, and contextual data to detect risks, this minimizes unnecessary MFA prompts.
- Admin tools: Features like risk preview mode, and risk-based policy assessments provide security teams with granular control and actionable data.
What needs improvement:
- Limited support for non-browser apps: Risk-based remembered devices work only with browser-based integrations. Cisco could provide broader coverage for non-browser apps.
- Dependency on Duo Desktop for Wi-Fi fingerprints: While Wi-Fi fingerprinting is helpful, it requires Duo Desktop installation on Windows and macOS devices, which adds deployment overhead.
OneLogin
One Login is an SSO and identity product. It supports cross-domain identity management (SCIM) for application provisioning. With robust integration capabilities with Active Directory, it is an ideal choice if AD serves as your primary source of truth for managing user identities and access.
Why we like it:
- Form-based authentication with HTML: Unlike many competitors, OneLogin supports form-based authentication. This allows the developers to use an HTML form to obtain credentials from users who are attempting to access secured web pages.
- Strong conditional access policies: OneLogin allows organizations to define granular access controls based on factors such as user role, location, device, and time of access.
What needs improvement:
- Outage issues: There have been DNS-related outages while using OneLogin.
- Limited on-prem MFA support: While OneLogin has extensive support for cloud environments, its capabilities for managing MFA on privileged local domain accounts are limited.
Thales SafeNet Trusted Access
SafeNet Trusted Access is an access management and authentication service. The software offers versatile interface options. SafeNet Trusted Access provides three distinct interfaces: the Platform Admin, the User Manager, and the Self-Service Portal.
- The Platform Admin interface – offers controls, such as IP filtering and policy management, giving administrators granular control over security settings.
- The User Manager interface – is designed for creating and managing users and tokens.
- The Self-Service Portal – enables users to handle basic tasks on their own, such as resetting their PINs.
Why we like it:
- Behavioral biometrics: Unlike some of its competitors, Thales leverages threat detection techniques, including behavioral biometrics, ensuring strong protection against fraudulent behavior.
- User-based licensing model: Thales allows a single-user license to support multiple tokens. This means users can utilize physical tokens, mobile apps, or other methods without requiring separate licenses for each.
What needs improvement:
- Outdated documentation: Some integration guides and field names are not up-to-date.
- Integrations: Integration with Microsoft Authenticator as a token could be added.
WSO2 Identity Server
WSO2 Identity Server is a customer identity and access management (CIAM) platform. It offers capabilities that can be easily integrated into your company’s customer experience (CX) or identity and access management (IAM) applications. WSO2 Identity Server is best for organizations that require an open, API-driven architecture and developer tools.
Why we like it:
- Developer-friendly IAM solution: Offers a wide range of developer tools, SDKs, and detailed documentation, making it ideal for teams building custom IAM implementations.
- Open source: WSO2 Identity Server is a free, open-source solution. It also offers enterprise-level features with licensing costs.
- Extensive protocol support: The solution supports SSO, SAML, OAuth, OpenID Connect, adaptive authentication, and multi-factor authentication.
What needs improvement:
- Integration issues: WSO2 Identity Server’s heavy reliance on SOAP APIs creates integration challenges. This dependency limits users’ ability to leverage certain functionalities that are more accessible and flexible with REST APIs.
IBM Verify
IBM Verify is the ideal solution for organizations transitioning to cloud IAM and requiring enterprise-level deployments. It is highly suitable for standard enterprise use cases with strong out-of-the-box integrations, particularly for user management and provisioning.
The solution offers multi-factor authentication (MFA) through push notifications, QR codes, and mobile app authentication. It also includes consent management templates to help users comply with data privacy regulations such as GDPR.
Why we like it:
- Extensive cloud coverage: IBM Verify unifies identity management for SaaS platforms like Salesforce, Office 365, and Slack, and integrates seamlessly with popular cloud platforms such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. By implementing IBM Verify, enterprises can enable single sign-on (SSO) and risk-based MFA across cloud and on-premises applications at scale.
- Ease of integration: Seamless integrates with HR tools and applications using custom SAML and OAuth. This helps to streamline the authentication process of new users.
What needs improvement:
- Resource-intensive: Setup and customization require significant time and effort for larger organizations.
- MFA coverage: The solution could include additional MFA methods, such as SMS verification.
Ping Identity PingOne Risk Management
Ping Identity PingOne Risk Management is an IAM solution that provides single sign-on (SSO), and multi-factor authentication (MFA). Ping offers strong support for legacy systems. It is ideal for enterprise-level deployments. Smaller businesses might find the platform over-engineered for their needs.
Why we like it:
- Customization: Ping offers greater customization for enterprises with complex IAM needs compared to solutions with out-of-the-box integrations.
- Zero trust support: Ping Identity has strong support for zero trust security models, particularly when dealing with sensitive or regulated data. As part of a Zero Trust approach, Ping Identity effectively integrates with device management tools to perform checks on device health (e.g., whether the device has up-to-date security patches or encryption) before allowing access.
What needs improvement:
- Requires skilled implementation: Ping has deep customization options, thus companies may require specialized resources or consultants to implement the solution.
- Lack of out-of-the-box integrations: Ping requires custom work to integrate with non-standard applications.
Okta
Okta, best known for its cloud-native IAM solutions, prioritizes rapid and efficient cloud deployment. It is a popular choice among tech companies and startups due to its cloud-native approach and extensive integrations.
Its adaptive multi-factor authentication (MFA) enables a more dynamic, context-based method, considering user behavior, device status, and location compared to traditional MFA solutions.
In addition to its competitors, Okta offers threat detection capabilities through its ‘ThreatInsight’ feature. This feature aggregates data on sign-in activity across Okta’s customer base, allowing it to analyze and identify potentially malicious IP addresses. By leveraging this collective data, Okta can proactively prevent common credential-based attacks, such as:
- password spraying
- credential stuffing
- brute-force cryptographic attacks
Why we like it:
- Threat detection for enhanced security: Automatically denies access to sign-in requests that come from potentially malicious IP addresses.
- Extensive integrations: Okta stands out with over 6,500 pre-built integrations across cloud, on-premises, and mobile applications. Its competitors, who typically offer more basic integrations such as Active Directory, LDAP, and a limited range of SAML and OAuth providers.
What needs improvement:
- Configurations: Overly restrictive configurations.
- Performance: Slow load times, leading to delays.
- Password controls: Password management policies that are not user-friendly, with frequent mandatory resets and restrictions on reusing previous passwords.
FAQ
Further reading
- Top 10 Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Solutions
- Top 10 Open Source RBAC Tools Based on GitHub Stars

Cem's work has been cited by leading global publications including Business Insider, Forbes, Washington Post, global firms like Deloitte, HPE and NGOs like World Economic Forum and supranational organizations like European Commission. You can see more reputable companies and resources that referenced AIMultiple.
Throughout his career, Cem served as a tech consultant, tech buyer and tech entrepreneur. He advised enterprises on their technology decisions at McKinsey & Company and Altman Solon for more than a decade. He also published a McKinsey report on digitalization.
He led technology strategy and procurement of a telco while reporting to the CEO. He has also led commercial growth of deep tech company Hypatos that reached a 7 digit annual recurring revenue and a 9 digit valuation from 0 within 2 years. Cem's work in Hypatos was covered by leading technology publications like TechCrunch and Business Insider.
Cem regularly speaks at international technology conferences. He graduated from Bogazici University as a computer engineer and holds an MBA from Columbia Business School.

Be the first to comment
Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.